Beyond procedural approaches to designing: a framework for supporting students’ hierarchical thinking through their representational journeys

This paper examines how designerly thinking, can be facilitated through the creation of design representations such as sketches, drawings, and 3D models. Doing this, we move beyond procedural accounts of designing to focus on how students use design representations to navigate their design journeys. Instead of only engaging in iterative steps, phases or stages of designing, we argue that designing fundamentally requires hierarchical thinking—the ability to move between different levels of abstraction and specificity which is evident in students’ design representations. Drawing on frameworks from professional design education, we adapt an existing taxonomy of design representations to align with the Irish technology education curriculum, by highlighting its relations to properties of design representations, different levels of hierarchical thinking and iterative designing. The proposed framework guides teachers and teacher educators in supporting students to strategically select representations that realise design ideas, while also enhancing design reasoning, metacognition, and the ability to move fluidly between different levels of thinking. Finally, we consider its implications for assessment, curriculum alignment, and pedagogical strategies, while also identifying potential limitations related to assessment-driven curricula and transferability beyond the Irish context

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34961/researchrepository-ul.29222819
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond procedural approaches to designing: a framework for supporting students’ hierarchical thinking through their representational journeys

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Design Education and Practice
article

Beyond procedural approaches to designing: a framework for supporting students’ hierarchical thinking through their representational journeys

article en

Abstract

This paper examines how designerly thinking, can be facilitated through the creation of design representations such as sketches, drawings, and 3D models. Doing this, we move beyond procedural accounts of designing to focus on how students use design representations to navigate their design journeys. Instead of only engaging in iterative steps, phases or stages of designing, we argue that designing fundamentally requires hierarchical thinking—the ability to move between different levels of abstraction and specificity which is evident in students’ design representations. Drawing on frameworks from professional design education, we adapt an existing taxonomy of design representations to align with the Irish technology education curriculum, by highlighting its relations to properties of design representations, different levels of hierarchical thinking and iterative designing. The proposed framework guides teachers and teacher educators in supporting students to strategically select representations that realise design ideas, while also enhancing design reasoning, metacognition, and the ability to move fluidly between different levels of thinking. Finally, we consider its implications for assessment, curriculum alignment, and pedagogical strategies, while also identifying potential limitations related to assessment-driven curricula and transferability beyond the Irish context

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
University of Limerick (IE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.