Comparative Study on Performance Evaluation of Eager versus Lazy Learning Methods

The major revenue in banking sector is generated long term deposits from customers. Many marketing strategies are implemented to target potential customers by examining their impacted characteristics for decision making. Therefore, machine learning as a scientific computing has drawn many interest in finding best potential customers especially in predicting whether a long term deposit is subscribed or not. In this research, lazy and eager learning of K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) and Random Forest (RF) is compared. The computation procedure of the prediction makes a sharp distinction between them and accordingly, RF is proven to be more superior than KNN in the term of Accuracy as much as 96%, Precision 93% and F1 score 0.97. Therefore, the ultimate performance of RF relies on the ability to handle non-linearities and its resistance to overfitting makes RF a suitable choice for many predictive applications. Keywords— Classification; Easy learning; Lazy Learning, Term Deposit

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28932/jutisi.v10i3.9197
Primary Topic
Customer churn and segmentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study on Performance Evaluation of Eager versus Lazy Learning Methods

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Customer churn and segmentation
article

Comparative Study on Performance Evaluation of Eager versus Lazy Learning Methods

article en

Abstract

The major revenue in banking sector is generated long term deposits from customers. Many marketing strategies are implemented to target potential customers by examining their impacted characteristics for decision making. Therefore, machine learning as a scientific computing has drawn many interest in finding best potential customers especially in predicting whether a long term deposit is subscribed or not. In this research, lazy and eager learning of K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) and Random Forest (RF) is compared. The computation procedure of the prediction makes a sharp distinction between them and accordingly, RF is proven to be more superior than KNN in the term of Accuracy as much as 96%, Precision 93% and F1 score 0.97. Therefore, the ultimate performance of RF relies on the ability to handle non-linearities and its resistance to overfitting makes RF a suitable choice for many predictive applications. Keywords— Classification; Easy learning; Lazy Learning, Term Deposit

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Customer churn and segmentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Study on Performance Evaluation of Eager versus Lazy Learning Methods · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS