‘Fat’, female and unprivileged: exploring intersectionality, perceiver characteristics, and eye movements

The aim of this research was to examine the role of body self-esteem, Body Mass Index (BMI), and the tendency toward social desirability as predictors of anti-fat stereotypes and prejudices, and gender, ‘fat’ status, and social status as moderators of this relationship, as well as eye movements of subjects when observing ‘fat’ individuals. Three studies examined the research aims. In the first study (N=311; 60.8% female), body self-esteem, self-reported BMI, and social desirability were assessed as predictors of anti-fat stereotypes and prejudice, with ‘fat’ status as a moderating variable. The second study (N=311; 60.8% female) replicated this approach, adding perceived social status as a moderator. The third study (N=191; 61.5% female) assessed body self-esteem and collected precise body-related measurements (weight, body fat, visceral fat, muscle percentage, metabolism, and BMI) using the OMRON body composition monitor. Additionally, it measured anti-fat stereotypes, prejudice, and eye movements in response to ‘fat’ and ‘non-fat’ stimuli. The results of the first study suggest that body self-esteem, BMI, and the tendency toward social de?sirability can predict anti-fat stereotypes and prejudices. ‘Fat’ women were evaluated most negatively. The second study indicates that the social status of stimulus individuals is also a significant moderator of the relationships described above. ‘Fat’ women of low social status are evaluated most negatively. In the third study, we obtained information on the following eye movement parameters: (1) First view, (2) Duration of fixations, (3) Fixations and (4) Revisits. Eye movement parameters can be predicted by body self-esteem and body condition parameters, while gender and ‘fat’ status of stimuli are significant moderators in this relationship. The study explains the role of BMI and body self-esteem in anti-fat bias, highlights the importance of gender and social status in perceiving ‘fat’ individuals, as well as the importance of considering nuanced body composition measures, such as visceral fat and muscle percentage, in understanding individual differences in perceptual bias. Differences in viewing patterns between genders underscore the interplay of stereotypes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34961/researchrepository-ul.28920476
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Fat’, female and unprivileged: exploring intersectionality, perceiver characteristics, and eye movements

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Obesity and Health Practices
article

‘Fat’, female and unprivileged: exploring intersectionality, perceiver characteristics, and eye movements

article en

Abstract

The aim of this research was to examine the role of body self-esteem, Body Mass Index (BMI), and the tendency toward social desirability as predictors of anti-fat stereotypes and prejudices, and gender, ‘fat’ status, and social status as moderators of this relationship, as well as eye movements of subjects when observing ‘fat’ individuals. Three studies examined the research aims. In the first study (N=311; 60.8% female), body self-esteem, self-reported BMI, and social desirability were assessed as predictors of anti-fat stereotypes and prejudice, with ‘fat’ status as a moderating variable. The second study (N=311; 60.8% female) replicated this approach, adding perceived social status as a moderator. The third study (N=191; 61.5% female) assessed body self-esteem and collected precise body-related measurements (weight, body fat, visceral fat, muscle percentage, metabolism, and BMI) using the OMRON body composition monitor. Additionally, it measured anti-fat stereotypes, prejudice, and eye movements in response to ‘fat’ and ‘non-fat’ stimuli. The results of the first study suggest that body self-esteem, BMI, and the tendency toward social de?sirability can predict anti-fat stereotypes and prejudices. ‘Fat’ women were evaluated most negatively. The second study indicates that the social status of stimulus individuals is also a significant moderator of the relationships described above. ‘Fat’ women of low social status are evaluated most negatively. In the third study, we obtained information on the following eye movement parameters: (1) First view, (2) Duration of fixations, (3) Fixations and (4) Revisits. Eye movement parameters can be predicted by body self-esteem and body condition parameters, while gender and ‘fat’ status of stimuli are significant moderators in this relationship. The study explains the role of BMI and body self-esteem in anti-fat bias, highlights the importance of gender and social status in perceiving ‘fat’ individuals, as well as the importance of considering nuanced body composition measures, such as visceral fat and muscle percentage, in understanding individual differences in perceptual bias. Differences in viewing patterns between genders underscore the interplay of stereotypes.

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
University of Limerick (IE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.