An exploration of women’s decision-making processes around accepting or declining vaccinations in pregnancy: A qualitative descriptive study

Objective: To explore women’s perceptions and experiences of accepting or declining vaccinations in pregnancy, and to identify factors that influence vaccination uptake. Design: A qualitative descriptive interview-based study. Setting: The maternity unit of a rural hospital in the Republic of Ireland. Participants: A purposive sample of eight women who were pregnant, aged 18 and over, who were receiving antenatal care through the public healthcare system. Half of the participants accepted vaccinations, while the other half declined, reflecting varying levels of vaccine hesitancy. Methods: Semi structured interviews (n=8) were conducted between July 2022 and August 2022 and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings: The study offers insight into women’s decision-making processes on vaccinations in pregnancy. Five main themes were identified (1). Maternal Instincts in the Shadow of Uncertainty, (2). Lack of Balanced Information, (3). Misinformation: Difficult to Ignore, (4). Navigating Fear and Social Pressures, (5). Perceived Benefits Outweighing Risk. Key conclusions: The decision-making process around vaccination in pregnancy is complex and multifaceted, influenced by various factors that can either hinder or promote uptake rates. Participants expressed complex emotions, associated fears and anxieties, and highlighted the necessity for more balanced and transparent dialogues with healthcare professionals. They emphasised the need for the dissemination of high-quality objective evidence from health authorities. This, they felt, would help facilitate genuine informed decision making, and ease the burden of feelings of uncertainty. Implications for practice: The provision of balanced, reliable, evidence-based information made available through multiple sources, alongside open and non-judgemental conversations with healthcare professionals is essential to support women in making informed decisions. Consequently, healthcare professionals require education and training to effectively communicate vaccination information clearly, empathetically, and in a way that is tailored to individual needs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34961/researchrepository-ul.29097533.v1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An exploration of women’s decision-making processes around accepting or declining vaccinations in pregnancy: A qualitative descriptive study

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

An exploration of women’s decision-making processes around accepting or declining vaccinations in pregnancy: A qualitative descriptive study

article en

Abstract

Objective: To explore women’s perceptions and experiences of accepting or declining vaccinations in pregnancy, and to identify factors that influence vaccination uptake. Design: A qualitative descriptive interview-based study. Setting: The maternity unit of a rural hospital in the Republic of Ireland. Participants: A purposive sample of eight women who were pregnant, aged 18 and over, who were receiving antenatal care through the public healthcare system. Half of the participants accepted vaccinations, while the other half declined, reflecting varying levels of vaccine hesitancy. Methods: Semi structured interviews (n=8) were conducted between July 2022 and August 2022 and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings: The study offers insight into women’s decision-making processes on vaccinations in pregnancy. Five main themes were identified (1). Maternal Instincts in the Shadow of Uncertainty, (2). Lack of Balanced Information, (3). Misinformation: Difficult to Ignore, (4). Navigating Fear and Social Pressures, (5). Perceived Benefits Outweighing Risk. Key conclusions: The decision-making process around vaccination in pregnancy is complex and multifaceted, influenced by various factors that can either hinder or promote uptake rates. Participants expressed complex emotions, associated fears and anxieties, and highlighted the necessity for more balanced and transparent dialogues with healthcare professionals. They emphasised the need for the dissemination of high-quality objective evidence from health authorities. This, they felt, would help facilitate genuine informed decision making, and ease the burden of feelings of uncertainty. Implications for practice: The provision of balanced, reliable, evidence-based information made available through multiple sources, alongside open and non-judgemental conversations with healthcare professionals is essential to support women in making informed decisions. Consequently, healthcare professionals require education and training to effectively communicate vaccination information clearly, empathetically, and in a way that is tailored to individual needs.

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
University of Limerick (IE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An exploration of women’s decision-making processes around accepting or declining vaccinations in pregnancy: A qualitative descriptive study · University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS