Can sign-naïve adults learn about the phonological regularities of an unfamiliar sign language from minimal exposure?

Adults can extract phonological regularities from just several minutes’ exposure to naturalistic input of an unknown spoken language (Gullberg et al., 2010). We examined whether such implicit statistical learning mechanisms also operate in the sign language modality. The input materials consisted of a con-tinuous sign stream in the form of a weather forecast in Svenskt Teckenspråk (STS). L1-speakers of Eng-lish with no prior knowledge of a sign language were assigned to two experimental groups who watched the forecast once (N=43) or twice (N=38), and a control group who did not watch it (N=40). Participants completed a ‘surprise’ lexical decision task designed to tap into their awareness of the phonological properties of the core STS lexicon. They viewed individual signs and indicated whether or not these could be real STS signs. The signs comprised four sets: STS signs that (1) were presented, and (2) were not presented, in the forecast; and signs that are not STS signs and (3) contain handshapes outside the STS handshape inventory, and (4) contain sets of phonological features that are dispreferred across sign languages. We found no evidence of any learning of STS phonological regularities. Considered in con-junction with two companion studies which did demonstrate some learning of sign forms and their meanings from these same input materials, our findings suggest limits to what can be learnt after just a few minutes of implicit and naturalistic exposure to language in an unfamiliar modality: information about specific lexical items is learnable, but information that requires generalisation across items may require greater amounts, or a different quality, of input.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34842/hofweber
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can sign-naïve adults learn about the phonological regularities of an unfamiliar sign language from minimal exposure?

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Can sign-naïve adults learn about the phonological regularities of an unfamiliar sign language from minimal exposure?

article en

Abstract

Adults can extract phonological regularities from just several minutes’ exposure to naturalistic input of an unknown spoken language (Gullberg et al., 2010). We examined whether such implicit statistical learning mechanisms also operate in the sign language modality. The input materials consisted of a con-tinuous sign stream in the form of a weather forecast in Svenskt Teckenspråk (STS). L1-speakers of Eng-lish with no prior knowledge of a sign language were assigned to two experimental groups who watched the forecast once (N=43) or twice (N=38), and a control group who did not watch it (N=40). Participants completed a ‘surprise’ lexical decision task designed to tap into their awareness of the phonological properties of the core STS lexicon. They viewed individual signs and indicated whether or not these could be real STS signs. The signs comprised four sets: STS signs that (1) were presented, and (2) were not presented, in the forecast; and signs that are not STS signs and (3) contain handshapes outside the STS handshape inventory, and (4) contain sets of phonological features that are dispreferred across sign languages. We found no evidence of any learning of STS phonological regularities. Considered in con-junction with two companion studies which did demonstrate some learning of sign forms and their meanings from these same input materials, our findings suggest limits to what can be learnt after just a few minutes of implicit and naturalistic exposure to language in an unfamiliar modality: information about specific lexical items is learnable, but information that requires generalisation across items may require greater amounts, or a different quality, of input.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.