The Ethics of Knowing: Using Neuroscience to Inform Prenatal Screening Practices for Intellectual and Developmental Disability

For her human rights capstone, Annika Penzer enrolled in the course NBIO 101: “Neruoscience Ethics” and produced a research paper examining how recent advances in neuroscience challenge the assumptions behind prenatal screening for intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). While screening technologies promise informed choice, they often present IDD in deficit-based terms, ignoring neuroscientific evidence of cognitive variability, plasticity, and emotional intelligence. This paper argues for counseling practices that incorporate both scientific nuance and the lived experiences of individuals with IDD, shifting the focus from preventing disability to supporting diverse forms of cognition. By bridging neuroscience and ethics, Penzer calls for more just and accurate approaches to reproductive decision-making. Student project deposited by department for archival purposes. Original work unavailable for public download due to permission restriction preferences of the author.

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/kh753qc9021
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ethics of Knowing: Using Neuroscience to Inform Prenatal Screening Practices for Intellectual and Developmental Disability

Stanford Digital Repository
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

The Ethics of Knowing: Using Neuroscience to Inform Prenatal Screening Practices for Intellectual and Developmental Disability

article en

Abstract

For her human rights capstone, Annika Penzer enrolled in the course NBIO 101: “Neruoscience Ethics” and produced a research paper examining how recent advances in neuroscience challenge the assumptions behind prenatal screening for intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). While screening technologies promise informed choice, they often present IDD in deficit-based terms, ignoring neuroscientific evidence of cognitive variability, plasticity, and emotional intelligence. This paper argues for counseling practices that incorporate both scientific nuance and the lived experiences of individuals with IDD, shifting the focus from preventing disability to supporting diverse forms of cognition. By bridging neuroscience and ethics, Penzer calls for more just and accurate approaches to reproductive decision-making. Student project deposited by department for archival purposes. Original work unavailable for public download due to permission restriction preferences of the author.

Stanford Digital Repository
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Ethics of Knowing: Using Neuroscience to Inform Prenatal Screening Practices for Intellectual and Developmental Disability · Stanford Digital Repository (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS