Stakeholder perspectives on environmental health-related testing

There has been a growing literature on exposome and environmental health-related research, public acceptance, and understanding of ecological health-related testing; however, it has remained underexplored, especially in the context of rapid testing. This study aims to fill this gap by gathering insights into what key stakeholders see as the primary ethical implications, benefits, and possible risks of environment-related tests. 32 interviews were conducted with potential users, medical providers, and ethicists, asking them about their perceptions of environment-related testing, who would benefit most from the research, and if these tests might detract focus from other, directly relevant health-related factors. The study found that the main concerns among these stakeholders include test reliability, the need for tests where the ecological factor being tested has a proven causality for human health, the possibility for individuals or communities to achieve change based on the test results, and the need for tests that foster social justice.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Health
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvh.2025.1610200
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder perspectives on environmental health-related testing

1 citations
Frontiers in Environmental Health
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
1.20
article

Stakeholder perspectives on environmental health-related testing

article en
1 citations

Abstract

There has been a growing literature on exposome and environmental health-related research, public acceptance, and understanding of ecological health-related testing; however, it has remained underexplored, especially in the context of rapid testing. This study aims to fill this gap by gathering insights into what key stakeholders see as the primary ethical implications, benefits, and possible risks of environment-related tests. 32 interviews were conducted with potential users, medical providers, and ethicists, asking them about their perceptions of environment-related testing, who would benefit most from the research, and if these tests might detract focus from other, directly relevant health-related factors. The study found that the main concerns among these stakeholders include test reliability, the need for tests where the ecological factor being tested has a proven causality for human health, the possibility for individuals or communities to achieve change based on the test results, and the need for tests that foster social justice.

Frontiers in Environmental HealthVol. 4
Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stakeholder perspectives on environmental health-related testing · Frontiers in Environmental Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS