Governance of Charities in Scotland

This paper examines the governance and accountability of third sector organizations, particularly charities, contrasting their corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices with those of private sector entities. While CSR is widely debated in profit-driven contexts, charitable organizations’ responsibilities toward their communities are not often discussed by lawyers or academics. Charity trustees’ decision-making processes is seldom scrutinised (let alone regulated), which raises critical questions: should this decision-making process be regulated under the same principles of for-profit institutions? Who should oversee these decisions? In Portugal, for example, charity governance lacks legal guidance and is deemed private. This contracts with Scotland’s regulatory framework, where charities are intensely scrutinised and regulated. In Scotland, the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR), established in 2005, actively supervises trustees, ensuring decisions align with charitable missions, therefore aiming to enhance decision-making efficiency, and enhancing public trust in the third sector. Aiming to shed light on the need for accountability, this article advocates for improved regulatory frameworks which promote efficacy and community benefit in the third sector, proposing Scotland’s model for jurisdictions like Portugal, which will promote public confidence and optimise the societal impact of not-for-profit entities such as charities, foundations or associations, among others.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(38)2025.ic-5
Primary Topic
Diverse Specialized Academic Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance of Charities in Scotland

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Diverse Specialized Academic Research
article

Governance of Charities in Scotland

article en

Abstract

This paper examines the governance and accountability of third sector organizations, particularly charities, contrasting their corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices with those of private sector entities. While CSR is widely debated in profit-driven contexts, charitable organizations’ responsibilities toward their communities are not often discussed by lawyers or academics. Charity trustees’ decision-making processes is seldom scrutinised (let alone regulated), which raises critical questions: should this decision-making process be regulated under the same principles of for-profit institutions? Who should oversee these decisions? In Portugal, for example, charity governance lacks legal guidance and is deemed private. This contracts with Scotland’s regulatory framework, where charities are intensely scrutinised and regulated. In Scotland, the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR), established in 2005, actively supervises trustees, ensuring decisions align with charitable missions, therefore aiming to enhance decision-making efficiency, and enhancing public trust in the third sector. Aiming to shed light on the need for accountability, this article advocates for improved regulatory frameworks which promote efficacy and community benefit in the third sector, proposing Scotland’s model for jurisdictions like Portugal, which will promote public confidence and optimise the societal impact of not-for-profit entities such as charities, foundations or associations, among others.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa (PT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Diverse Specialized Academic Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.