Navigating Geopolitics and Culture: A Comparative Analysis of Inclusive Education Policy in China and Vietnam

Inclusive education (IE) is a global movement in addressing the inequalities faced by children with disabilities, but the way a country interprets it can vary. This comparative case study explores how the complex socio-cultural and geopolitical contexts in China and Vietnam create the nations’ own unique ways of conceptualizing the ideology of IE. Through a qualitative analysis of IE-related policy documents in China and Vietnam, we find Confucian ideologies to be present in both countries’ policies. However, Vietnam adopts a rights-based language that contradicts traditional cultural values yet aligns more closely with international frameworks, while China, in contrast, has developed its own model of inclusion, emphasizing integration based on local resource capacity and cultural beliefs, with less focus on conforming to global standards. We argue that this difference can be explained by how nation-states position themselves within geopolitics based on concerns such as sovereignty or international funding. This study contributes to the IE literature by revealing how international relations and local dimensions, including cultural values, interplay within national policy contexts to shape a country’s understanding of IE.

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/nd557yp3202
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Geopolitics and Culture: A Comparative Analysis of Inclusive Education Policy in China and Vietnam

Stanford Digital Repository
Big Data and Business Intelligence
article

Navigating Geopolitics and Culture: A Comparative Analysis of Inclusive Education Policy in China and Vietnam

article en

Abstract

Inclusive education (IE) is a global movement in addressing the inequalities faced by children with disabilities, but the way a country interprets it can vary. This comparative case study explores how the complex socio-cultural and geopolitical contexts in China and Vietnam create the nations’ own unique ways of conceptualizing the ideology of IE. Through a qualitative analysis of IE-related policy documents in China and Vietnam, we find Confucian ideologies to be present in both countries’ policies. However, Vietnam adopts a rights-based language that contradicts traditional cultural values yet aligns more closely with international frameworks, while China, in contrast, has developed its own model of inclusion, emphasizing integration based on local resource capacity and cultural beliefs, with less focus on conforming to global standards. We argue that this difference can be explained by how nation-states position themselves within geopolitics based on concerns such as sovereignty or international funding. This study contributes to the IE literature by revealing how international relations and local dimensions, including cultural values, interplay within national policy contexts to shape a country’s understanding of IE.

Stanford Digital Repository
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.