Student engagement profiles in technology-rich environments: What they reveal about motivational beliefs, perceived task difficulty, and performance

Previous studies have confirmed the pivotal roles of student engagement in predicting learning achievements; however, only a few emphasized the patterns of different engagement dimensions within individuals (i.e., co-occurrences of behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement). Thus, this study identifies engagement profiles and explores their potential antecedents (i.e., achievement goal orientations, academic self-efficacy, and perceived task difficulty) and consequences (i.e., task performance). One hundred and eleven (N = 111) medical students solved a diagnostic task in BioWorld, a technology-rich learning environment that simulated virtual patients to improve students’ diagnostic skills. Behavioral engagement was extracted from computer trace data, whereas both cognitive and emotional engagement were measured by questionnaires. Using a latent profile analysis (LPA), this study revealed four engagement profiles: Cognitively Disengaged, Behaviorally Engaged, Moderately Engaged, and Cognitively and Emotionally Engaged. Subsequent multinomial logistic regressions showed that mastery-approach goals and academic self-efficacy significantly increased the likelihood of being memberships in the Cognitively and Emotionally Engaged profile. Moreover, higher perceptions of task difficulty led students to be more cognitively and emotionally engaged. Additionally, students in the Cognitively and Emotionally Engaged profile tended to achieve a higher diagnostic accuracy (i.e., whether students achieved a correct diagnosis), whereas Behaviorally Engaged students were more likely to obtain higher scores in diagnostic efficacy (i.e., the overlaps between students’ and medical experts’ diagnostic processes). These findings support the multidimensional engagement perspective, and the implications of these profiles for students’ motivation and instructional designs are discussed.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30191/ets.202501_28(1).rp12
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student engagement profiles in technology-rich environments: What they reveal about motivational beliefs, perceived task difficulty, and performance

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Student engagement profiles in technology-rich environments: What they reveal about motivational beliefs, perceived task difficulty, and performance

article en

Abstract

Previous studies have confirmed the pivotal roles of student engagement in predicting learning achievements; however, only a few emphasized the patterns of different engagement dimensions within individuals (i.e., co-occurrences of behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement). Thus, this study identifies engagement profiles and explores their potential antecedents (i.e., achievement goal orientations, academic self-efficacy, and perceived task difficulty) and consequences (i.e., task performance). One hundred and eleven (N = 111) medical students solved a diagnostic task in BioWorld, a technology-rich learning environment that simulated virtual patients to improve students’ diagnostic skills. Behavioral engagement was extracted from computer trace data, whereas both cognitive and emotional engagement were measured by questionnaires. Using a latent profile analysis (LPA), this study revealed four engagement profiles: Cognitively Disengaged, Behaviorally Engaged, Moderately Engaged, and Cognitively and Emotionally Engaged. Subsequent multinomial logistic regressions showed that mastery-approach goals and academic self-efficacy significantly increased the likelihood of being memberships in the Cognitively and Emotionally Engaged profile. Moreover, higher perceptions of task difficulty led students to be more cognitively and emotionally engaged. Additionally, students in the Cognitively and Emotionally Engaged profile tended to achieve a higher diagnostic accuracy (i.e., whether students achieved a correct diagnosis), whereas Behaviorally Engaged students were more likely to obtain higher scores in diagnostic efficacy (i.e., the overlaps between students’ and medical experts’ diagnostic processes). These findings support the multidimensional engagement perspective, and the implications of these profiles for students’ motivation and instructional designs are discussed.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Student engagement profiles in technology-rich environments: What they reveal about motivational beliefs, perceived task difficulty, and performance · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS