Theorizing Lean as a Socio-Technical System: Examining the Reciprocal Interactions between Lean Social and Technical Subsystems

Lean enhances efficiency and supports continuous improvement. However, the dynamic interaction between its social (soft) and technical (hard) subsystems remains insufficiently explored. Existing research has largely examined these subsystems in isolation which this study addresses by examining their interaction as a balanced socio-technical system (STS) at multiple performance levels. Adopting a socio-technical systems theoretical lens, we used the ‘antecedents-phenomenon-consequences’ process logic to operationalize the interplay between the social and technical subsystems of Lean by conducting a critical and systematic review of 58 peer-reviewed empirical studies. This analysis led to the development of three process theory models, from which three propositions have been derived, highlighting the reciprocal interactions between these subsystems. First, paradoxical and dialectical tensions are inherent in the Lean technical subsystem, limiting its contributions at the individual, group, and organizational levels. Second, the Lean social subsystem, which comprises employee empowerment, training, work design, cross-functional collaboration, and management involvement, addresses these tensions. Third, Lean, as a symbiotic socio-technical system, fosters synergies that enhance operational performance, bolster dynamic capabilities, and drive process innovation. For practitioners, this study offers actionable insights into balancing the social and technical aspects of Lean to effectively manage tensions and achieve performance gains.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25916/sut.29115758.v1
Primary Topic
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theorizing Lean as a Socio-Technical System: Examining the Reciprocal Interactions between Lean Social and Technical Subsystems

Figshare
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
article

Theorizing Lean as a Socio-Technical System: Examining the Reciprocal Interactions between Lean Social and Technical Subsystems

article en

Abstract

Lean enhances efficiency and supports continuous improvement. However, the dynamic interaction between its social (soft) and technical (hard) subsystems remains insufficiently explored. Existing research has largely examined these subsystems in isolation which this study addresses by examining their interaction as a balanced socio-technical system (STS) at multiple performance levels. Adopting a socio-technical systems theoretical lens, we used the ‘antecedents-phenomenon-consequences’ process logic to operationalize the interplay between the social and technical subsystems of Lean by conducting a critical and systematic review of 58 peer-reviewed empirical studies. This analysis led to the development of three process theory models, from which three propositions have been derived, highlighting the reciprocal interactions between these subsystems. First, paradoxical and dialectical tensions are inherent in the Lean technical subsystem, limiting its contributions at the individual, group, and organizational levels. Second, the Lean social subsystem, which comprises employee empowerment, training, work design, cross-functional collaboration, and management involvement, addresses these tensions. Third, Lean, as a symbiotic socio-technical system, fosters synergies that enhance operational performance, bolster dynamic capabilities, and drive process innovation. For practitioners, this study offers actionable insights into balancing the social and technical aspects of Lean to effectively manage tensions and achieve performance gains.

Figshare
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.