Evaluating Taxonomic Approaches: A Comparative Study of Educational Frameworks Applied to Mathematics Assessments

The design of effective assessments and reporting of a student’s achievement on learning objectives are often overlooked, leaving educational stakeholders lacking the ability to create meaningful evaluations. To assist in creating substantial mathematics assessments this work seeks to answer the following research questions: ‘How can educational taxonomies be utilized to improve the design of mathematics assessments’? and ‘What are the strengths and weaknesses of applying different taxonomies onto mathematics assessments?’. The purpose of this study is to (1) develop a practical design instrument for easier identification and categorization of assessment questions within each educational taxonomy structure and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of each classification process within the identified educational taxonomies for mathematics assessments, while outlining the suggested implications. With a focus on three renowned taxonomies, Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (RBT), Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (Webb’s DOK), Structured of Observed Learning and Outcome (SOLO), and a mathematics specific taxonomy, Cangelosi’s Learning Levels, four unit exams of a college algebra course were classified within each framework. Collected data resulted in a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each taxonomy’s application. Findings indicate Cangelosi’s Learning Levels are the most effective taxonomy for mathematics due to categories more appropriately describing the type of math problems and additionally providing a holistic connection between what is taught and assessed. Aligning learning objectives and assessment questions allow for accurately measuring students’ knowledge, promoting different levels of critical thinking, and fostering deeper understanding. This study recommends the necessary leveraging instrument for designing assessments and suggests the most effective taxonomy for meaningful assessment practices in mathematics education.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26076/c537-4af6
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Taxonomic Approaches: A Comparative Study of Educational Frameworks Applied to Mathematics Assessments

Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
article

Evaluating Taxonomic Approaches: A Comparative Study of Educational Frameworks Applied to Mathematics Assessments

article en

Abstract

The design of effective assessments and reporting of a student’s achievement on learning objectives are often overlooked, leaving educational stakeholders lacking the ability to create meaningful evaluations. To assist in creating substantial mathematics assessments this work seeks to answer the following research questions: ‘How can educational taxonomies be utilized to improve the design of mathematics assessments’? and ‘What are the strengths and weaknesses of applying different taxonomies onto mathematics assessments?’. The purpose of this study is to (1) develop a practical design instrument for easier identification and categorization of assessment questions within each educational taxonomy structure and (2) evaluate the effectiveness of each classification process within the identified educational taxonomies for mathematics assessments, while outlining the suggested implications. With a focus on three renowned taxonomies, Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (RBT), Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (Webb’s DOK), Structured of Observed Learning and Outcome (SOLO), and a mathematics specific taxonomy, Cangelosi’s Learning Levels, four unit exams of a college algebra course were classified within each framework. Collected data resulted in a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each taxonomy’s application. Findings indicate Cangelosi’s Learning Levels are the most effective taxonomy for mathematics due to categories more appropriately describing the type of math problems and additionally providing a holistic connection between what is taught and assessed. Aligning learning objectives and assessment questions allow for accurately measuring students’ knowledge, promoting different levels of critical thinking, and fostering deeper understanding. This study recommends the necessary leveraging instrument for designing assessments and suggests the most effective taxonomy for meaningful assessment practices in mathematics education.

Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Taxonomic Approaches: A Comparative Study of Educational Frameworks Applied to Mathematics Assessments · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS