Comparing language input in homes of young blind and sighted children: Insights from daylong recordings

We compared everyday language input to young congenitally-blind children with no additional disa-bilities (N=15, 6–30 mo., M:16 mo.) and demographically-matched sighted peers (N=15, 6–31 mo., M:16 mo.). By studying whether the language input of blind children differs from their sighted peers, we aimed to determine whether, in principle, the language acquisition patterns observed in blind and sighted children could be explained by aspects of the speech they hear. Children wore LENA recorders to capture the auditory language environment in their homes. Speech in these recordings was then an-alyzed with a mix of automated and manually-transcribed measures across various subsets and dimen-sions of language input. These included measures of quantity (adult words), interaction (conversa-tional turns and child-directed speech), linguistic properties (lexical diversity and mean length of ut-terance), and conceptual features (talk centered around the here-and-now; talk focused on visual ref-erents that would be inaccessible to the blind but not sighted children). Overall, we found broad simi-larity across groups in speech quantitative, interactive, and linguistic properties. The only exception was that blind children’s language environments contained slightly but significantly more talk about past/future/hypothetical events than sighted children’s input; both groups received equivalent quanti-ties of “visual” speech input. The findings challenge the notion that blind children’s language input diverges substantially from sighted children’s; while the input is highly variable across children, it is not systematically so across groups, across nearly all measures. The findings suggest instead that blind children and sighted children alike receive input that readily supports their language development, with open questions remaining regarding how this input may be differentially leveraged by language learners in early childhood.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34842/ldr2025-846
Primary Topic
Ecology and biodiversity studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing language input in homes of young blind and sighted children: Insights from daylong recordings

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Ecology and biodiversity studies
article

Comparing language input in homes of young blind and sighted children: Insights from daylong recordings

article en

Abstract

We compared everyday language input to young congenitally-blind children with no additional disa-bilities (N=15, 6–30 mo., M:16 mo.) and demographically-matched sighted peers (N=15, 6–31 mo., M:16 mo.). By studying whether the language input of blind children differs from their sighted peers, we aimed to determine whether, in principle, the language acquisition patterns observed in blind and sighted children could be explained by aspects of the speech they hear. Children wore LENA recorders to capture the auditory language environment in their homes. Speech in these recordings was then an-alyzed with a mix of automated and manually-transcribed measures across various subsets and dimen-sions of language input. These included measures of quantity (adult words), interaction (conversa-tional turns and child-directed speech), linguistic properties (lexical diversity and mean length of ut-terance), and conceptual features (talk centered around the here-and-now; talk focused on visual ref-erents that would be inaccessible to the blind but not sighted children). Overall, we found broad simi-larity across groups in speech quantitative, interactive, and linguistic properties. The only exception was that blind children’s language environments contained slightly but significantly more talk about past/future/hypothetical events than sighted children’s input; both groups received equivalent quanti-ties of “visual” speech input. The findings challenge the notion that blind children’s language input diverges substantially from sighted children’s; while the input is highly variable across children, it is not systematically so across groups, across nearly all measures. The findings suggest instead that blind children and sighted children alike receive input that readily supports their language development, with open questions remaining regarding how this input may be differentially leveraged by language learners in early childhood.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Ecology and biodiversity studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.