Flotation vs Chamber Rest A Comparison of Techniques and Their Differential Effects on Relaxation and Self Disclosure

Developing more or less simultaneously over the last thirty years, water immersion/floatation restricted environmental stimulation techniques (REST) and chamber REST, came to be recognized as two of the most effective methods of minimizing external stimulation to the physical senses. These two environments were compared in a controlled study of 36 male undergraduates, for indications of reduced blood pressure and reductions in self-reported stress. In addition, the participants were assessed for post-treatment differences in self-disclosure, or willingness to share personal information about themselves. Results indicated that for a single one hour session, individuals in the floatation environment achieved significant reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, while individuals in both the chamber and classroom control, yielded non-significant changes. On self-reported stress, all three groups indicated significant reductions with no differences between groups. Finally, there were no significant differences on the Personal Sharing Questionnaire.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25777/zvps-rw77
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flotation vs Chamber Rest A Comparison of Techniques and Their Differential Effects on Relaxation and Self Disclosure

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
article

Flotation vs Chamber Rest A Comparison of Techniques and Their Differential Effects on Relaxation and Self Disclosure

article en

Abstract

Developing more or less simultaneously over the last thirty years, water immersion/floatation restricted environmental stimulation techniques (REST) and chamber REST, came to be recognized as two of the most effective methods of minimizing external stimulation to the physical senses. These two environments were compared in a controlled study of 36 male undergraduates, for indications of reduced blood pressure and reductions in self-reported stress. In addition, the participants were assessed for post-treatment differences in self-disclosure, or willingness to share personal information about themselves. Results indicated that for a single one hour session, individuals in the floatation environment achieved significant reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, while individuals in both the chamber and classroom control, yielded non-significant changes. On self-reported stress, all three groups indicated significant reductions with no differences between groups. Finally, there were no significant differences on the Personal Sharing Questionnaire.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Dominion University College (GH), Old Dominion University (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Flotation vs Chamber Rest A Comparison of Techniques and Their Differential Effects on Relaxation and Self Disclosure · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS