Painless Patients and Painful Bodies: Birth Control under Biopolitical Care in China

This paper investigates the phenomenological dimensions of women’s experiences of contraception under China’s one-child policy. Drawing on interviews with eight women in Nanjing, the study highlights cases where birth control was remembered as painless, trivial, or completely forgotten. Contrary to the dominant literature, which emphasizes the tangible pains and coercive aspects of birth control policies, this research explores existential forms of suffering—anxiety, guilt, and melancholy—that remain largely unspoken and unintelligible. By examining these affective responses, the paper argues that pain experienced through birth control extends beyond bodily symptoms, manifesting instead as existential disturbances arising from disrupted life rhythms and foreclosed familial possibilities. The study further critiques the nature of biopolitical care under the one-child policy, contending that its medicalized approach erases forms of pain that lack clinical visibility. Ultimately, the paper advocates for an ethical reorientation towards a more gentle, interpersonal care, one that acknowledges and attends to the nuanced, often invisible suffering of women’s reproductive experiences.

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/nm512yp7408
Primary Topic
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Painless Patients and Painful Bodies: Birth Control under Biopolitical Care in China

Stanford Digital Repository
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
article

Painless Patients and Painful Bodies: Birth Control under Biopolitical Care in China

article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the phenomenological dimensions of women’s experiences of contraception under China’s one-child policy. Drawing on interviews with eight women in Nanjing, the study highlights cases where birth control was remembered as painless, trivial, or completely forgotten. Contrary to the dominant literature, which emphasizes the tangible pains and coercive aspects of birth control policies, this research explores existential forms of suffering—anxiety, guilt, and melancholy—that remain largely unspoken and unintelligible. By examining these affective responses, the paper argues that pain experienced through birth control extends beyond bodily symptoms, manifesting instead as existential disturbances arising from disrupted life rhythms and foreclosed familial possibilities. The study further critiques the nature of biopolitical care under the one-child policy, contending that its medicalized approach erases forms of pain that lack clinical visibility. Ultimately, the paper advocates for an ethical reorientation towards a more gentle, interpersonal care, one that acknowledges and attends to the nuanced, often invisible suffering of women’s reproductive experiences.

Stanford Digital Repository
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.