Angina in stable ischaemic heart disease

The placebo effect describes the natural human tendency to react positively to a healer. As the first placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the ORBITA (Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation with optimal medical Therapy of Angioplasty in stable angina) trial was ground-breaking. After decades of routine use, ORBITA showed that PCI offered no significant angina relief compared to placebo on a background of maximally tolerated antianginal medications. Despite this finding, guidelines continue to recommend PCI as an additional therapy for persistent angina refractory to antianginal medication. ORBITA left cardiologists with many questions. Central to the future of PCI as a treatment for angina was the question of whether PCI was simply ineffective, or whether the guideline directed antianginal medication used in ORBITA had attenuated all the observable benefit of PCI. I led the delivery of the ORBITA-2 Trial; designed to answer this question. ORBITA-2 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with stable angina. To determine the unattenuated efficacy of PCI for angina relief, it was designed with the critical step of removing background antianginal medical therapy. ORBITA-2 shows that PCI, under double-blind placebo-controlled conditions, without background antianginal medications, gives clear benefit across multiple endpoints: angina, quality of life and treadmill exercise time. The benefit is immediate and sustained, although not all symptoms are eliminated. In this thesis, I present the primary and secondary results of the ORBITA-2 Trial. In addition, I present a systematic review and meta-regression of all placebo-controlled trials of procedural therapies, designed to determine for which endpoints blinding matters most. Finally, I present the results of the n-of-1 placebo-controlled ORBITA-STAR trial which tested whether independent symptom verification using anot at al placebo-controlled ischaemic stimulus could distinguish which patients achieve symptom relief from PCI.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imperial College Research Computing Service Data Repository
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25560/122502
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Angina in stable ischaemic heart disease

Imperial College Research Computing Service Data Repository
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
article

Angina in stable ischaemic heart disease

article en

Abstract

The placebo effect describes the natural human tendency to react positively to a healer. As the first placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the ORBITA (Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation with optimal medical Therapy of Angioplasty in stable angina) trial was ground-breaking. After decades of routine use, ORBITA showed that PCI offered no significant angina relief compared to placebo on a background of maximally tolerated antianginal medications. Despite this finding, guidelines continue to recommend PCI as an additional therapy for persistent angina refractory to antianginal medication. ORBITA left cardiologists with many questions. Central to the future of PCI as a treatment for angina was the question of whether PCI was simply ineffective, or whether the guideline directed antianginal medication used in ORBITA had attenuated all the observable benefit of PCI. I led the delivery of the ORBITA-2 Trial; designed to answer this question. ORBITA-2 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with stable angina. To determine the unattenuated efficacy of PCI for angina relief, it was designed with the critical step of removing background antianginal medical therapy. ORBITA-2 shows that PCI, under double-blind placebo-controlled conditions, without background antianginal medications, gives clear benefit across multiple endpoints: angina, quality of life and treadmill exercise time. The benefit is immediate and sustained, although not all symptoms are eliminated. In this thesis, I present the primary and secondary results of the ORBITA-2 Trial. In addition, I present a systematic review and meta-regression of all placebo-controlled trials of procedural therapies, designed to determine for which endpoints blinding matters most. Finally, I present the results of the n-of-1 placebo-controlled ORBITA-STAR trial which tested whether independent symptom verification using anot at al placebo-controlled ischaemic stimulus could distinguish which patients achieve symptom relief from PCI.

Imperial College Research Computing Service Data Repository
Imperial College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.