"Is this sedation?" : A Group Delphi process to define cut-off doses and dosing intervals for potentially sedating drugs in palliative care

Background: In palliative care, it can be challenging to distinguish between reduced consciousness related to the illness and sedation due to a potentially sedating drug (intended, or unintended). These differentiations are important because unintended sedation requires consideration of alternative treatment options, and intentional sedation demands compliance with guidelines. The aim of the study, which was part of the consortium project iSedPall, was to determine cut-off values for drugs’ doses/dosing intervals which are expected to result in defined depth of sedation/continuous effect. Methods: Group Delphi conducted in Germany with prior online survey. Based on a review of the literature, statements regarding cut-off values for drugs´ doses/dosing intervals which are expected to result in a defined depth of sedation/continuous effect were developed for 11 drugs. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement. Statements with lower agreement entered the next round of discussion. Between the rounds (5 small groups, 3 – 4 participants each), the results were presented and discussed. If necessary, statements were adapted for the following round. Participating experts were physicians, pharmacists, and nurses experienced in palliative care, mostly with over 10 years of professional experience. Results: 25/30 invited experts participated in the online survey, 17 in the Group Delphi. 12/33 statements were consented in the survey. The initial questionnaire for the Group Delphi comprised 22 statements on ten drugs. After three rounds, consensus was reached for all statements, determining cut-off doses/dosing intervals for lorazepam, midazolam, diazepam, levomepromazine, haloperidol, melperone, pipamperone, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and trazodone. Conclusions: This study for the first time provides evidence- and expert consensus-based data to support clinical judgements regarding sedating effects of a range of potentially sedating drugs commonly used in palliative care.

Publication Details

Journal
Digitalen Hochschulbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt (Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25673/120203
Primary Topic
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"Is this sedation?" : A Group Delphi process to define cut-off doses and dosing intervals for potentially sedating drugs in palliative care

Digitalen Hochschulbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt (Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt)
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
article

"Is this sedation?" : A Group Delphi process to define cut-off doses and dosing intervals for potentially sedating drugs in palliative care

article en

Abstract

Background: In palliative care, it can be challenging to distinguish between reduced consciousness related to the illness and sedation due to a potentially sedating drug (intended, or unintended). These differentiations are important because unintended sedation requires consideration of alternative treatment options, and intentional sedation demands compliance with guidelines. The aim of the study, which was part of the consortium project iSedPall, was to determine cut-off values for drugs’ doses/dosing intervals which are expected to result in defined depth of sedation/continuous effect. Methods: Group Delphi conducted in Germany with prior online survey. Based on a review of the literature, statements regarding cut-off values for drugs´ doses/dosing intervals which are expected to result in a defined depth of sedation/continuous effect were developed for 11 drugs. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement. Statements with lower agreement entered the next round of discussion. Between the rounds (5 small groups, 3 – 4 participants each), the results were presented and discussed. If necessary, statements were adapted for the following round. Participating experts were physicians, pharmacists, and nurses experienced in palliative care, mostly with over 10 years of professional experience. Results: 25/30 invited experts participated in the online survey, 17 in the Group Delphi. 12/33 statements were consented in the survey. The initial questionnaire for the Group Delphi comprised 22 statements on ten drugs. After three rounds, consensus was reached for all statements, determining cut-off doses/dosing intervals for lorazepam, midazolam, diazepam, levomepromazine, haloperidol, melperone, pipamperone, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and trazodone. Conclusions: This study for the first time provides evidence- and expert consensus-based data to support clinical judgements regarding sedating effects of a range of potentially sedating drugs commonly used in palliative care.

Digitalen Hochschulbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt (Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Plant Ecology and Soil Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.