Colombia’s Nationality Law: A Historical Interpretation

This dissertation, employing historical and doctrinal methods, offers a comprehensive analysis of the factors shaping Colombian nationality law, with a particular focus on Colombia’s exceptional conditional ius soli regime. Drawing on existing scholarship regarding determinants in the evolution of nationality regimes, two approaches are identified to explain the Colombian context. A nation-building approach emphasises the influence of historical legacies on nationality law, and a migration-based approach highlights the impact of international migration on initial and subsequent nationality regimes. Within this framework, the dissertation explores the pervasive theme of racialisation within immigration policies. The research illustrates that in the post-colonial era nation-building efforts aimed to ‘whiten’ the population through European immigration, thereby embedding racialised effects within immigration and nationality policies. In the contemporary context, it underscores the interplay of nationality and immigration policies, which collectively produce a system that disproportionately affects the entry and settlement of individuals racialised as non-white, rendering access to nationality less likely for children of individuals in these marginalised groups. Consequently, the dissertation argues for a thorough analysis of facially neutral requirements in immigration policies, considering their potential for indirect discrimination against certain groups. Furthermore, this dissertation analyses recent changes in Colombia’s nationality regime triggered by the Venezuelan migration crisis, with a secondary focus on international human rights law standards intersecting nationality law and international migration. Notably, Colombia’s adoption of a risk-based approach to statelessness in addressing the nationality of children born to Venezuelan parents in Colombia is assessed. Ultimately, this study argues for a re-evaluation of the domicile requirement within Colombia’s nationality law in such a way as to allow children of irregular migrants andasylum seekers domiciled in Colombia to obtain Colombian nationality by birth. It recommends a shift towards unconditional ius soli, or alternatively, the decoupling of domicile and parental migratory status, aligning with Inter-American human rights standards.

Publication Details

Journal
University of Leicester
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.25650591
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colombia’s Nationality Law: A Historical Interpretation

University of Leicester
Corporate Governance and Law
article

Colombia’s Nationality Law: A Historical Interpretation

article en

Abstract

This dissertation, employing historical and doctrinal methods, offers a comprehensive analysis of the factors shaping Colombian nationality law, with a particular focus on Colombia’s exceptional conditional ius soli regime. Drawing on existing scholarship regarding determinants in the evolution of nationality regimes, two approaches are identified to explain the Colombian context. A nation-building approach emphasises the influence of historical legacies on nationality law, and a migration-based approach highlights the impact of international migration on initial and subsequent nationality regimes. Within this framework, the dissertation explores the pervasive theme of racialisation within immigration policies. The research illustrates that in the post-colonial era nation-building efforts aimed to ‘whiten’ the population through European immigration, thereby embedding racialised effects within immigration and nationality policies. In the contemporary context, it underscores the interplay of nationality and immigration policies, which collectively produce a system that disproportionately affects the entry and settlement of individuals racialised as non-white, rendering access to nationality less likely for children of individuals in these marginalised groups. Consequently, the dissertation argues for a thorough analysis of facially neutral requirements in immigration policies, considering their potential for indirect discrimination against certain groups. Furthermore, this dissertation analyses recent changes in Colombia’s nationality regime triggered by the Venezuelan migration crisis, with a secondary focus on international human rights law standards intersecting nationality law and international migration. Notably, Colombia’s adoption of a risk-based approach to statelessness in addressing the nationality of children born to Venezuelan parents in Colombia is assessed. Ultimately, this study argues for a re-evaluation of the domicile requirement within Colombia’s nationality law in such a way as to allow children of irregular migrants andasylum seekers domiciled in Colombia to obtain Colombian nationality by birth. It recommends a shift towards unconditional ius soli, or alternatively, the decoupling of domicile and parental migratory status, aligning with Inter-American human rights standards.

University of Leicester
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Corporate Governance and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.