COVID-19 vaccination and long COVID-19

According to the literature, COVID-19 vaccines reduce long COVID-19 symptoms such as cognitive dysfunction, kidney diseases, myalgia, and sleeping disorders (5-7). Therefore, the results of the meta-analysis support the clinical safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against long COVID-19. However, the available studies have several limitations: 1) there were individuals that exhibited natural improvement of long COVID-19 symptoms which may have been underestimated as vaccination in clinical setting; 2) studies used wide range of COVID-19 vaccines including both inactivated vaccines and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Thus, findings should be interpreted with caution. Since booster vaccines show great promise in both prevention of infection and progression, further research on boosters and omicron-specific vaccination is needed to be performed. Consequently, the current comprehensive literature recommends SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to reduce the risk of long COVID-19 in cases of progression. There are no findings of a negative effect of COVID-19 vaccination on worsening symptoms of COVID-19. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination should be improved as soon as possible, especially offering a full course of vaccination. More research is needed to discover the mechanism of action of the COVID-19 vaccines on long COVID-19 in the future.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22038/rcm.2025.83612.1513
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COVID-19 vaccination and long COVID-19

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

COVID-19 vaccination and long COVID-19

article en

Abstract

According to the literature, COVID-19 vaccines reduce long COVID-19 symptoms such as cognitive dysfunction, kidney diseases, myalgia, and sleeping disorders (5-7). Therefore, the results of the meta-analysis support the clinical safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against long COVID-19. However, the available studies have several limitations: 1) there were individuals that exhibited natural improvement of long COVID-19 symptoms which may have been underestimated as vaccination in clinical setting; 2) studies used wide range of COVID-19 vaccines including both inactivated vaccines and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Thus, findings should be interpreted with caution. Since booster vaccines show great promise in both prevention of infection and progression, further research on boosters and omicron-specific vaccination is needed to be performed. Consequently, the current comprehensive literature recommends SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to reduce the risk of long COVID-19 in cases of progression. There are no findings of a negative effect of COVID-19 vaccination on worsening symptoms of COVID-19. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination should be improved as soon as possible, especially offering a full course of vaccination. More research is needed to discover the mechanism of action of the COVID-19 vaccines on long COVID-19 in the future.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Iranshahr University (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.