Differentielles Lernen im Praxissemester

In teacher education research, the relevance of differences in the individual preconditions of preservice teachers for the use of learning opportunities is emphasized. With the help of the concept of differential learning, this study addresses intra-individual and inter-individual differences in the individual preconditions of preservice teachers, which are reflected in learning processes and learning outcomes. Using four categories to capture differential learning (mechanism, process, classification and interaction), the empirical gap in differential learning is described. It is examined which insights the investigation of differential learning offers for teaching practicum research and which differential insights can be generated through selected research methods. Within three sub-studies, a total of N = 188 preservice teachers from three cohorts were examined. Narrative interviews, self-assessments and a task battery were used to assess extrinsic learning motivation, basic psychological needs and coping with incoherence as individual preconditions. The data were analyzed using narrative analysis, random intercept cross-lagged panel models, and conditional effects models. Changes were found for all individual preconditions, which interact with contextual factors such as school and university mentoring, so that learning opportunities promote different learning outcomes both inter- and intra-individually. All three methods of analysis, considering the categories to capture differential learning, showed a basic suitability with simultaneous limitations. The results point to the need to develop learning opportunities that consider the individual preconditions of preservice teachers as well as situational conditions. To capture the underlying, complex relationships, quantitative research requires methods that go beyond sample-based approaches and adopt a dynamic, person-related perspective.

Publication Details

Journal
Common Library Network (Der Gemeinsame Bibliotheksverbund)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.65925
Primary Topic
Education Methods and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentielles Lernen im Praxissemester

Common Library Network (Der Gemeinsame Bibliotheksverbund)
Education Methods and Technologies
article

Differentielles Lernen im Praxissemester

article en

Abstract

In teacher education research, the relevance of differences in the individual preconditions of preservice teachers for the use of learning opportunities is emphasized. With the help of the concept of differential learning, this study addresses intra-individual and inter-individual differences in the individual preconditions of preservice teachers, which are reflected in learning processes and learning outcomes. Using four categories to capture differential learning (mechanism, process, classification and interaction), the empirical gap in differential learning is described. It is examined which insights the investigation of differential learning offers for teaching practicum research and which differential insights can be generated through selected research methods. Within three sub-studies, a total of N = 188 preservice teachers from three cohorts were examined. Narrative interviews, self-assessments and a task battery were used to assess extrinsic learning motivation, basic psychological needs and coping with incoherence as individual preconditions. The data were analyzed using narrative analysis, random intercept cross-lagged panel models, and conditional effects models. Changes were found for all individual preconditions, which interact with contextual factors such as school and university mentoring, so that learning opportunities promote different learning outcomes both inter- and intra-individually. All three methods of analysis, considering the categories to capture differential learning, showed a basic suitability with simultaneous limitations. The results point to the need to develop learning opportunities that consider the individual preconditions of preservice teachers as well as situational conditions. To capture the underlying, complex relationships, quantitative research requires methods that go beyond sample-based approaches and adopt a dynamic, person-related perspective.

Common Library Network (Der Gemeinsame Bibliotheksverbund)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Education Methods and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.