Conceptual models of state support for agriculture: From direct producer support to financing general agricultural services

Since the concept of state support for agriculture in Ukraine is not perfect and requires improvement, given the limited financial capabilities of the country during a full-scale invasion and post-war recovery, the aim of the article was to find an optimal model of state support based on the experience of countries with a highly developed agricultural sector. The features of conceptual models of state support were considered through indicators of structural and dynamic analysis and assessments of the effectiveness of budget support in the EU, Canada, New Zealand, the USA, and Ukraine. The premise of the study was an analysis of the overall imbalance level of state support directions for agriculture, according to the results of which none of the countries had a balanced approach to regulating the agricultural sector. It was established that the reason for the highest levels of imbalance in the EU was the undisputed dominance of producer support and, in the USA – consumer support, simultaneously with a low priority of financing for agricultural knowledge and innovations in both countries. A hybrid model of state support turned out to be a feature for Ukraine since dissimilar directions prevailed during different periods of turbulence. Given the assessment of the effectiveness, Ukraine should use the Canadian model in the short term, which, although similar to the EU, supports farmers on a much smaller scale and has a relatively upper focus on general services for the agriculture, in particular inspections and controls and knowledge and innovations. It was established that in the long term, the priority is to adapt the New Zealand approach with the absolute dominance of investments in infrastructure, research and technological development, which ensures maximum economic effect and competitiveness of the industry. The findings of the study can be used by the Ukrainian authorities, in particular the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food, to improve state support programmes for agriculture by adapting effective financing models based on international experience and taking into account the economic and resource realities of the country.

Publication Details

Journal
AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.364482
Primary Topic
Agriculture Market Analysis Ukraine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual models of state support for agriculture: From direct producer support to financing general agricultural services

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Agriculture Market Analysis Ukraine
article

Conceptual models of state support for agriculture: From direct producer support to financing general agricultural services

article en

Abstract

Since the concept of state support for agriculture in Ukraine is not perfect and requires improvement, given the limited financial capabilities of the country during a full-scale invasion and post-war recovery, the aim of the article was to find an optimal model of state support based on the experience of countries with a highly developed agricultural sector. The features of conceptual models of state support were considered through indicators of structural and dynamic analysis and assessments of the effectiveness of budget support in the EU, Canada, New Zealand, the USA, and Ukraine. The premise of the study was an analysis of the overall imbalance level of state support directions for agriculture, according to the results of which none of the countries had a balanced approach to regulating the agricultural sector. It was established that the reason for the highest levels of imbalance in the EU was the undisputed dominance of producer support and, in the USA – consumer support, simultaneously with a low priority of financing for agricultural knowledge and innovations in both countries. A hybrid model of state support turned out to be a feature for Ukraine since dissimilar directions prevailed during different periods of turbulence. Given the assessment of the effectiveness, Ukraine should use the Canadian model in the short term, which, although similar to the EU, supports farmers on a much smaller scale and has a relatively upper focus on general services for the agriculture, in particular inspections and controls and knowledge and innovations. It was established that in the long term, the priority is to adapt the New Zealand approach with the absolute dominance of investments in infrastructure, research and technological development, which ensures maximum economic effect and competitiveness of the industry. The findings of the study can be used by the Ukrainian authorities, in particular the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food, to improve state support programmes for agriculture by adapting effective financing models based on international experience and taking into account the economic and resource realities of the country.

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Agriculture Market Analysis Ukraine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conceptual models of state support for agriculture: From direct producer support to financing general agricultural services · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS