Who should have (no) children? Results of a vignette experiment in Switzerland

Objective: In this study, we test whether same-sex couples and singles seeking to have a child by surrogacy or adoption are viewed more critically compared to different-sex couples. We rely on data from a factorial survey experiment run on a representative sample of the Swiss population. Background: Empirical studies of attitudes towards non-normative reproduction often lack a theoretical foundation. Based on the concept of hegemonic heteronormativity and heteronormalization, our central thesis is that certain family types are subsumed into the norm, while others remain excluded. Method: A factorial survey experiment on the acceptance of adoption and surrogacy for intended parents with differing relationship status and sexual orientation, income, education, age, and number of children in the family was conducted to test this assumption with 2,128 respondents from a representative sample of the Swiss population. Results: The results show that same-sex couples have similar acceptance rates to female-male couples, while singles, older intended parents, and intended parents with low incomes are least accepted as adoptive parents. In general, there is a firm rejection of surrogacy and a low willingness to (even partially) fund either adoption or surrogacy publicly. Conclusion: While we find a similar level of support for same-sex intended parents through adoption as different-sex couples, single, older, and low-income intended parents are less accepted by the Swiss population. - Appendix: https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/jfr/index.php/jfr/article/view/1188/865

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-1188-866
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who should have (no) children? Results of a vignette experiment in Switzerland

Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Who should have (no) children? Results of a vignette experiment in Switzerland

article en

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we test whether same-sex couples and singles seeking to have a child by surrogacy or adoption are viewed more critically compared to different-sex couples. We rely on data from a factorial survey experiment run on a representative sample of the Swiss population. Background: Empirical studies of attitudes towards non-normative reproduction often lack a theoretical foundation. Based on the concept of hegemonic heteronormativity and heteronormalization, our central thesis is that certain family types are subsumed into the norm, while others remain excluded. Method: A factorial survey experiment on the acceptance of adoption and surrogacy for intended parents with differing relationship status and sexual orientation, income, education, age, and number of children in the family was conducted to test this assumption with 2,128 respondents from a representative sample of the Swiss population. Results: The results show that same-sex couples have similar acceptance rates to female-male couples, while singles, older intended parents, and intended parents with low incomes are least accepted as adoptive parents. In general, there is a firm rejection of surrogacy and a low willingness to (even partially) fund either adoption or surrogacy publicly. Conclusion: While we find a similar level of support for same-sex intended parents through adoption as different-sex couples, single, older, and low-income intended parents are less accepted by the Swiss population. - Appendix: https://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/jfr/index.php/jfr/article/view/1188/865

Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who should have (no) children? Results of a vignette experiment in Switzerland · Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS