A propos des relations écologie et société

Ecology and economics, apart from their common root, seem to be fundamentally opposed. The ecological crisis is often presented as an inevitable consequence of all technological process. This rejection of the development of productive forces enables the fierceness of social struggles to be underestimated, the idea of austerity to be considered as unavoidable and science and scientists to be held responsible for this state of affairs. The development of mathematical models whose forecasts are catastrophic, guarantees objectivity. But all models are built on hypotheses that are coloured by the ideology of the individuals or groups that build them. The close analysis of two fundamental concepts used in these models — natural resources and consumption — shows that these concepts are not clear and that their use is strongly conditioned by the dominant ideology. The consideration of the use of natural resources shows that the present dominant strategies lead to possibilities being wasted, to waste products, — apparently resources that have been thrown away, — being accumulated, and to possible technological choices being limited. All this goes against the widening of knowledge and of technological possibilities which enable solutions to be increasingly suited to the heterogenous possibilities of nature. The control of productive forces would not be enough if it were not accompanied by a revision of intervention strategies inherited from a pre -ecological era. It is in this sense that ecology acquires its true dimension in the economic field.

Publication Details

Journal
AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.351126
Primary Topic
French Urban and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A propos des relations écologie et société

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
French Urban and Social Studies
article

A propos des relations écologie et société

article en

Abstract

Ecology and economics, apart from their common root, seem to be fundamentally opposed. The ecological crisis is often presented as an inevitable consequence of all technological process. This rejection of the development of productive forces enables the fierceness of social struggles to be underestimated, the idea of austerity to be considered as unavoidable and science and scientists to be held responsible for this state of affairs. The development of mathematical models whose forecasts are catastrophic, guarantees objectivity. But all models are built on hypotheses that are coloured by the ideology of the individuals or groups that build them. The close analysis of two fundamental concepts used in these models — natural resources and consumption — shows that these concepts are not clear and that their use is strongly conditioned by the dominant ideology. The consideration of the use of natural resources shows that the present dominant strategies lead to possibilities being wasted, to waste products, — apparently resources that have been thrown away, — being accumulated, and to possible technological choices being limited. All this goes against the widening of knowledge and of technological possibilities which enable solutions to be increasingly suited to the heterogenous possibilities of nature. The control of productive forces would not be enough if it were not accompanied by a revision of intervention strategies inherited from a pre -ecological era. It is in this sense that ecology acquires its true dimension in the economic field.

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
French Urban and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.