Identifying Subject Bias in WiFi-based Human Activity Recognition Evaluation Methods

WiFi-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has emerged as a promising approach for monitoring and analysing human activities in a non-intrusive manner, leveraging WiFi signals for activity classification. Despite advancements, existing WiFi-based HAR research lacks consideration of subject (human) bias. This results in learning models performing well on individuals used in the training samples but failing to generalise to new/unseen subjects, in contrast to known good practices in machine learning. In this paper, we address this oversight directly by systematically examining the evaluation methodology for the WiFi-based HAR context. Specifically, we investigate the impact of Leave-One-Subject-Out Cross-Validation (LOSOCV) in a hybrid architecture combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Attention-based Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory networks (ABiLSTM), designed to capture both spatial and temporal patterns in WiFi signals. However, our emphasis remains on the application of LOSOCV as a method for improving generalization and reducing subject bias, rather than on the architecture itself. The model’s effectiveness is evaluated using LOSOCV, and we compare its performance against conventional hold-out validation and k-fold validation. Additionally, we utilize weighted metrics for model evaluation to address class imbalance, ensuring a fair assessment across all activity categories. Our results demonstrate the importance of LOSOCV in providing a realistic assessment of HAR model performance and underscore that addressing subject bias is essential for the deployment of these systems in practical scenarios such as healthcare monitoring, smart homes, and security applications.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin)
Published
2025-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21427/1bw7-ye78
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Subject Bias in WiFi-based Human Activity Recognition Evaluation Methods

1 citations
Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin)
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
0.73
article

Identifying Subject Bias in WiFi-based Human Activity Recognition Evaluation Methods

article en
1 citations

Abstract

WiFi-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has emerged as a promising approach for monitoring and analysing human activities in a non-intrusive manner, leveraging WiFi signals for activity classification. Despite advancements, existing WiFi-based HAR research lacks consideration of subject (human) bias. This results in learning models performing well on individuals used in the training samples but failing to generalise to new/unseen subjects, in contrast to known good practices in machine learning. In this paper, we address this oversight directly by systematically examining the evaluation methodology for the WiFi-based HAR context. Specifically, we investigate the impact of Leave-One-Subject-Out Cross-Validation (LOSOCV) in a hybrid architecture combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Attention-based Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory networks (ABiLSTM), designed to capture both spatial and temporal patterns in WiFi signals. However, our emphasis remains on the application of LOSOCV as a method for improving generalization and reducing subject bias, rather than on the architecture itself. The model’s effectiveness is evaluated using LOSOCV, and we compare its performance against conventional hold-out validation and k-fold validation. Additionally, we utilize weighted metrics for model evaluation to address class imbalance, ensuring a fair assessment across all activity categories. Our results demonstrate the importance of LOSOCV in providing a realistic assessment of HAR model performance and underscore that addressing subject bias is essential for the deployment of these systems in practical scenarios such as healthcare monitoring, smart homes, and security applications.

Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin)
Technological University Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.