Different Tendencies Regarding the Liability of Robots

The high-speed entry of third-level robots, known as intelligent robots, into the social arena, on the one hand, provides countless opportunities for development, and on the other hand, causes many challenges and threats to the safety of humanity. The duty of criminal law is to support the positive achievements of this new phenomenon and to face the risks arising from it. The issue is that in the light of the dangerous activities of artificial intelligence and the commission of various crimes, the burden of criminal responsibility is focused on human actors - as the case may be, the programmer or the producer or the user or all of them, can we defend the criminal competence of robots and the need to identify them? In this research, conflicting viewpoints have been extracted and discussed with the descriptive-analytical method and library tools. According to the results, these phenomena have complex algorithms and as a result, their ability to learn, solve problems and make independent decisions, has convinced some of the possibility of their entry into the group of criminal law followers. But the majority are of the opinion that the mentioned beings are under the influence of human planning and guidance. Therefore, they are innocent agents in the violation of basic values, and criminal responsibility based on theories of causation is stronger than stewardship or vicarious responsibility. The accuracy of conflicting reasons has led to the negation of the first approach and not envisioning a perspective for it.