Analysis and Review of I’TIBĀRĪYĀT from the Point of View of Jurists and Uṣūlīs

The different understanding of the jurists and Uṣūlīs about the existence of the credit and real concepts has caused them to confuse the two in many cases and extend the works and rulings of facts to I’TIBĀRĪYĀT. In this article, in order to solve this problem, which is caused by the differences in the views of jurists and Uṣūlīs, we will first get to know their views and their reasons, and then choose the correct basis. By examining the viewpoints of jurists and Uṣūlīs regarding I’TIBĀRĪYĀT and its rulings, we concluded that in this area there are two basic bases between jurists and Uṣūlīs. Some believe that the extension of the rulings of facts to validity is correct and some other believes in separating the rulings of facts from those of credibility, and each of them cites his own reasons for this. Finally, we concluded that the basis of those who believe in the separation of rulings of facts from those of credibility is correct, so we choose this theory by mentioning some reasons.