Why is there a lot to be said in favour of – and what would be – auxiliary digitality? Between a genuine digital pragmatics for the humanities and a philosophy of science of digital procedures

How we understand the digital transformation is not only important for the nature of a digital philosophical analysis in general. It also has an impact on what philosophy expects of the digital humanities. The author discusses this thesis with regard to discourses on digitality on the one hand and the relationship between DH and philosophy on the other. As far as the latter is concerned, she argues in favour of a phase of relaxed experimentation under the auspices of a merely auxiliary digitality instead of exaggerated avant-gardisms.

Publication Details

Journal
Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18716/pd.v1i1.2426
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why is there a lot to be said in favour of – and what would be – auxiliary digitality? Between a genuine digital pragmatics for the humanities and a philosophy of science of digital procedures

Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

Why is there a lot to be said in favour of – and what would be – auxiliary digitality? Between a genuine digital pragmatics for the humanities and a philosophy of science of digital procedures

article en

Abstract

How we understand the digital transformation is not only important for the nature of a digital philosophical analysis in general. It also has an impact on what philosophy expects of the digital humanities. The author discusses this thesis with regard to discourses on digitality on the one hand and the relationship between DH and philosophy on the other. As far as the latter is concerned, she argues in favour of a phase of relaxed experimentation under the auspices of a merely auxiliary digitality instead of exaggerated avant-gardisms.

Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why is there a lot to be said in favour of – and what would be – auxiliary digitality? Between a genuine digital pragmatics for the humanities and a philosophy of science of digital procedures · Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS