La question des "transferts" dans le développement agricole en Europe socialiste (URSS et autres pays de l'Est)

The industrial and agricultural development of USSR and (after 1 945) other European socialist countries was characterized by huge transfers of wealth, first from agricultural to industry, and then in the opposite direction. This gigantic turn around can be understood only in keeping with the deep specificity (compared to the industrialized West) of the internal and external conditions, the rhythms and the mechanisms of the socio-economic development in this geo-political area. So one can explain the change from a «peasant» agricultural,collectivized in a way to function as an enormous ^surplus pump» to the advantage of the «primitive industrial accumulation», to a stage when one tends to realize, socially faster than technically, the «industrialization» of agricultural on a strict meaning, i-e the model of the «factory» in the fields. The setting up and the functioning of this model are generally costly and feed themselves, obviously, in great part, on a levying from industry.

Publication Details

Journal
AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.351395
Primary Topic
Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

La question des "transferts" dans le développement agricole en Europe socialiste (URSS et autres pays de l'Est)

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition
article

La question des "transferts" dans le développement agricole en Europe socialiste (URSS et autres pays de l'Est)

article en

Abstract

The industrial and agricultural development of USSR and (after 1 945) other European socialist countries was characterized by huge transfers of wealth, first from agricultural to industry, and then in the opposite direction. This gigantic turn around can be understood only in keeping with the deep specificity (compared to the industrialized West) of the internal and external conditions, the rhythms and the mechanisms of the socio-economic development in this geo-political area. So one can explain the change from a «peasant» agricultural,collectivized in a way to function as an enormous ^surplus pump» to the advantage of the «primitive industrial accumulation», to a stage when one tends to realize, socially faster than technically, the «industrialization» of agricultural on a strict meaning, i-e the model of the «factory» in the fields. The setting up and the functioning of this model are generally costly and feed themselves, obviously, in great part, on a levying from industry.

AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.