Computer Graphics Instructors' Intentions for Using Generative AI for Teaching

Background: Generative AI has significant potential to support learning processes, such as generating personalized content matching individual student needs. It also has the potential to support teaching processes by assisting instructors in generating content, assessing students, or supporting practice. This study investigates how computer graphics instructors have used generative AI or are planning to use generative AI to support their teaching. We implemented an anonymous online survey based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) methodology and distributed it among Eurographics members. The research questions were: (1) What are computer graphics instructors' ways of integrating generative AI for teaching and learning purposes? (2) What are the influencing factors computer graphics instructors have considered for integrating generative AI for teaching and learning purposes? Results: Between October 2024 and January 2025, we received 12 responses. Findings suggest that while some instructors have integrated generative AI into some aspects of their teaching, others have not and are hesitant to adopt them in the future, particularly as related to generating content for creating assignments such as lecture notes, summaries, teaching examples, etc., and supporting their assessment processes such as providing feedback, evaluating assignments, or grading exams. However, instructors were more open to using generative AI to support their teaching practices, particularly as related to pedagogy, such as providing students with interactive practice problems and supporting their creative content generation. Conclusion: Findings from the study identified the level of acceptance among computer graphics instructors, primarily full professors, and their experiences and intentions for using generative AI. To get a better understanding of the adoption of generative AI in the field of computer graphics education, we would like to invite the community to share their experiences and future intentions via the survey, which will remain open for additional input.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eurographics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2312/eged.20251006
Primary Topic
Educational Games and Gamification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computer Graphics Instructors' Intentions for Using Generative AI for Teaching

Eurographics
Educational Games and Gamification
article

Computer Graphics Instructors' Intentions for Using Generative AI for Teaching

article en

Abstract

Background: Generative AI has significant potential to support learning processes, such as generating personalized content matching individual student needs. It also has the potential to support teaching processes by assisting instructors in generating content, assessing students, or supporting practice. This study investigates how computer graphics instructors have used generative AI or are planning to use generative AI to support their teaching. We implemented an anonymous online survey based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) methodology and distributed it among Eurographics members. The research questions were: (1) What are computer graphics instructors' ways of integrating generative AI for teaching and learning purposes? (2) What are the influencing factors computer graphics instructors have considered for integrating generative AI for teaching and learning purposes? Results: Between October 2024 and January 2025, we received 12 responses. Findings suggest that while some instructors have integrated generative AI into some aspects of their teaching, others have not and are hesitant to adopt them in the future, particularly as related to generating content for creating assignments such as lecture notes, summaries, teaching examples, etc., and supporting their assessment processes such as providing feedback, evaluating assignments, or grading exams. However, instructors were more open to using generative AI to support their teaching practices, particularly as related to pedagogy, such as providing students with interactive practice problems and supporting their creative content generation. Conclusion: Findings from the study identified the level of acceptance among computer graphics instructors, primarily full professors, and their experiences and intentions for using generative AI. To get a better understanding of the adoption of generative AI in the field of computer graphics education, we would like to invite the community to share their experiences and future intentions via the survey, which will remain open for additional input.

Eurographics
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Educational Games and Gamification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Computer Graphics Instructors' Intentions for Using Generative AI for Teaching · Eurographics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS