Die Begriffspaare von Urbild und Abbild, von Verstandeswelt und Sinnenwelt

A number of Platonic motifs that play a significant role in Kant’s thought already appear in Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten’s Metaphysica, the decades-long guide to his lectures on this main philosophical discipline. This paper is the first to undertake a detailed analysis of the presumed sources of such Platonically-influenced key paragraphs from this work. According to § 866, God’s complete self-knowledge forms the unsurpassed model for a theology practised by finite beings. The classical distinction between ‘mundus sensibilis’ and ‘mundus intelligibilis’ takes on a decidedly practical flavour in § 869, when God is conceived of as the scrutinizer of hearts. In situating these two pieces of teaching historically, it becomes apparent that Baumgarten on the one hand draws on the conceptual pair of ‘theologia archetypa’ and ‘theologia ectypa’ common in the early modern period, and on the other hand on the final ethical-theological section of Leibniz’s Monadologie with its ideal conception of a moral world made possible by God.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19283/lph2024.885
Primary Topic
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Die Begriffspaare von Urbild und Abbild, von Verstandeswelt und Sinnenwelt

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
article

Die Begriffspaare von Urbild und Abbild, von Verstandeswelt und Sinnenwelt

article en

Abstract

A number of Platonic motifs that play a significant role in Kant’s thought already appear in Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten’s Metaphysica, the decades-long guide to his lectures on this main philosophical discipline. This paper is the first to undertake a detailed analysis of the presumed sources of such Platonically-influenced key paragraphs from this work. According to § 866, God’s complete self-knowledge forms the unsurpassed model for a theology practised by finite beings. The classical distinction between ‘mundus sensibilis’ and ‘mundus intelligibilis’ takes on a decidedly practical flavour in § 869, when God is conceived of as the scrutinizer of hearts. In situating these two pieces of teaching historically, it becomes apparent that Baumgarten on the one hand draws on the conceptual pair of ‘theologia archetypa’ and ‘theologia ectypa’ common in the early modern period, and on the other hand on the final ethical-theological section of Leibniz’s Monadologie with its ideal conception of a moral world made possible by God.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.