The Modal-Epistemic Argument: wintein's Rebuttals Rebutted

In a recent paper, Stefan Wintein criticizes my responses to the objections he raised to my modal-epistemic argument (mea) for the existence of God. In this paper, I continue our debate and respond to Wintein’s criticisms of my previous responses. I argue that Wintein’s criticisms are unsuccessful. As a result, the mea still stands.

Publication Details

Journal
VU Research Portal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19272/202500701009
Primary Topic
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Modal-Epistemic Argument: wintein's Rebuttals Rebutted

VU Research Portal
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
article

The Modal-Epistemic Argument: wintein's Rebuttals Rebutted

article en

Abstract

In a recent paper, Stefan Wintein criticizes my responses to the objections he raised to my modal-epistemic argument (mea) for the existence of God. In this paper, I continue our debate and respond to Wintein’s criticisms of my previous responses. I argue that Wintein’s criticisms are unsuccessful. As a result, the mea still stands.

VU Research Portal
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Modal-Epistemic Argument: wintein's Rebuttals Rebutted · VU Research Portal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS