Perception of Occupational Hazard Among Nurses in a Southeastern Anatolia Public Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract Background: Healthcare workers, especially nurses, face high risks due to their exposure to various workplace hazards. Identifying the perception of occupational hazards faced by nurses can be beneficial for both nurses themselves and the health system, as it may assist reduce risk. Aim: This study aimed to assess the level of perception of occupational hazards among nurses and to identify associated factors in a public hospital in Southeastern Anatolia, Türkiye. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 211 nurses using an online questionnaire. Data were collected using a socio-demographic and work-related questionnaire, along with a perception of occupational hazard scale. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to compare the quantitative data, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered significant. Results: A total of 137 out of 211 nurses (64.9%) considered their profession to be very risky. The results show that nurses perceive their occupational hazards as high, with a mean score of 4.19 out of 5 and 71.38 out of 85 total scores. Among the sub-dimensions, risks related to physical space (temperature, floor, humidity, noise level, and reflections and glare caused by glass and other surfaces) received an average score of 3.34 out of 5, personal and organizational risks 4.77, and psychological and ergonomic risks 4.24. Nurses who worked rotating shifts perceived a higher risk than those who worked day shifts (p=0.022). Additionally, nurses who worked in night shift reported higher perceptions of occupational hazards (p=0.002). Nurses who worked more than 60 hours per week perceived a higher risk compared to those who worked between 30-40 and 40-50 hours per week (p=0.048). Furthermore, nurses who worked overtime had higher perception scores for occupational hazard than those who did not work overtime (p=0.006). Conclusion: As a result, it was revealed that nurses work in a high-risk environment and have a high level of perception of occupational hazards, especially regarding personal and institutional risks, as well as psychological and ergonomic risks. Factors such as working rotating shifts and night shifts, high weekly working hours, and overtime affect the perception of occupational hazards. Reduction of weekly working hours and overtime, organization of shift system, and, systematic training on occupational hazards can be useful in reducing occupational hazards. [Ethiop. J. Health Dev. 2024; 38(3): 00-00] Keywords: Perception of occupational hazard, nurses, healthcare workers, workplace safety, Türkiye

Publication Details

Journal
National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20372/ejhd.v38i3.6395
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception of Occupational Hazard Among Nurses in a Southeastern Anatolia Public Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study

National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Perception of Occupational Hazard Among Nurses in a Southeastern Anatolia Public Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Healthcare workers, especially nurses, face high risks due to their exposure to various workplace hazards. Identifying the perception of occupational hazards faced by nurses can be beneficial for both nurses themselves and the health system, as it may assist reduce risk. Aim: This study aimed to assess the level of perception of occupational hazards among nurses and to identify associated factors in a public hospital in Southeastern Anatolia, Türkiye. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 211 nurses using an online questionnaire. Data were collected using a socio-demographic and work-related questionnaire, along with a perception of occupational hazard scale. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to compare the quantitative data, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered significant. Results: A total of 137 out of 211 nurses (64.9%) considered their profession to be very risky. The results show that nurses perceive their occupational hazards as high, with a mean score of 4.19 out of 5 and 71.38 out of 85 total scores. Among the sub-dimensions, risks related to physical space (temperature, floor, humidity, noise level, and reflections and glare caused by glass and other surfaces) received an average score of 3.34 out of 5, personal and organizational risks 4.77, and psychological and ergonomic risks 4.24. Nurses who worked rotating shifts perceived a higher risk than those who worked day shifts (p=0.022). Additionally, nurses who worked in night shift reported higher perceptions of occupational hazards (p=0.002). Nurses who worked more than 60 hours per week perceived a higher risk compared to those who worked between 30-40 and 40-50 hours per week (p=0.048). Furthermore, nurses who worked overtime had higher perception scores for occupational hazard than those who did not work overtime (p=0.006). Conclusion: As a result, it was revealed that nurses work in a high-risk environment and have a high level of perception of occupational hazards, especially regarding personal and institutional risks, as well as psychological and ergonomic risks. Factors such as working rotating shifts and night shifts, high weekly working hours, and overtime affect the perception of occupational hazards. Reduction of weekly working hours and overtime, organization of shift system, and, systematic training on occupational hazards can be useful in reducing occupational hazards. [Ethiop. J. Health Dev. 2024; 38(3): 00-00] Keywords: Perception of occupational hazard, nurses, healthcare workers, workplace safety, Türkiye

National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.