Bias in results of randomised trials: Direction, threshold, and context

The project consists of four studies: 1) a scoping review to describe the principles and terminology for assessing the direction of bias, minimally relevant degree of bias, and interaction between sources of bias in results of randomised clinical trials. 2) a cross-sectional study and expert sruvey to analyse the mechanisms of direction of bias. 3) a vignette study to assess the threshold for minimal relevant bias as perceived by clinical research methodologists and systematic reviews authors. 4) a comparative analysis to identify likely and possible sources of contextual variation in estimates of observer bias.

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/8jmfs
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias in results of randomised trials: Direction, threshold, and context

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Bias in results of randomised trials: Direction, threshold, and context

article en

Abstract

The project consists of four studies: 1) a scoping review to describe the principles and terminology for assessing the direction of bias, minimally relevant degree of bias, and interaction between sources of bias in results of randomised clinical trials. 2) a cross-sectional study and expert sruvey to analyse the mechanisms of direction of bias. 3) a vignette study to assess the threshold for minimal relevant bias as perceived by clinical research methodologists and systematic reviews authors. 4) a comparative analysis to identify likely and possible sources of contextual variation in estimates of observer bias.

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bias in results of randomised trials: Direction, threshold, and context · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS