Person-centred process? Procedural fairness and Care Act 2014 needs assessments

This article examines the process of seeking social care needs assessments under the Care Act 2014 in England through the lens of procedural fairness theory. Drawing on interviews with 21 individuals with experiences of needs assessments, we identify the ‘process qualities’—the factors rooted in the literature on procedural fairness—that matter most to people navigating this critical front-line component of the social care system. Our analysis reveals two themes: the importance of ‘dignified treatment’ and system ‘proactivity’, each underpinned by a set of process qualities. These qualities for the former—personalization, empathy, and voice—are well explored in the literature on person-centred care. However, the latter—responsibility taking, dependability, transparency, assistance, and availability—are neglected in current research on experiences of the Care Act 2014. Drawing on these process qualities, we set out the potential for future research grounded in procedural fairness theory in social care.

Publication Details

Journal
Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17868/strath.00092712
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Person-centred process? Procedural fairness and Care Act 2014 needs assessments

Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

Person-centred process? Procedural fairness and Care Act 2014 needs assessments

article en

Abstract

This article examines the process of seeking social care needs assessments under the Care Act 2014 in England through the lens of procedural fairness theory. Drawing on interviews with 21 individuals with experiences of needs assessments, we identify the ‘process qualities’—the factors rooted in the literature on procedural fairness—that matter most to people navigating this critical front-line component of the social care system. Our analysis reveals two themes: the importance of ‘dignified treatment’ and system ‘proactivity’, each underpinned by a set of process qualities. These qualities for the former—personalization, empathy, and voice—are well explored in the literature on person-centred care. However, the latter—responsibility taking, dependability, transparency, assistance, and availability—are neglected in current research on experiences of the Care Act 2014. Drawing on these process qualities, we set out the potential for future research grounded in procedural fairness theory in social care.

Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.