The Prevent Duty in Primary Education: A Comparative Study

In 2015, the Prevent Duty (HM Government, 2015) placed a legal requirement on educational institutions to show ‘due regard’ to the need to prevent young people from being drawn into extremism or terrorism. Following this, training programmes were created so that teachers could fulfil this responsibility. In this study, primary school teachers’ experiences and opinions on the Prevent Duty are compared between two different schools in the same metropolitan council. The first school is situated in a community in which most people living there are Muslim; the second school is situated within a predominantly white, middle-class, non-Muslim community. Teachers were interviewed in semi-structured interviews about their experiences of the Prevent Duty, its training programmes and how relevant they considered it to be for the children they teach in their setting. Their responses to these questions are compared to identify any differences on attitudes towards the Prevent Duty between the two areas. Findings suggest that the way in which the Prevent Duty is viewed by teachers, including the importance they place on it, their experiences of the training programmes and how relevant they see it as being to the children in their setting differs between the two areas

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.114546
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prevent Duty in Primary Education: A Comparative Study

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Education and Islamic Studies
article

The Prevent Duty in Primary Education: A Comparative Study

article en

Abstract

In 2015, the Prevent Duty (HM Government, 2015) placed a legal requirement on educational institutions to show ‘due regard’ to the need to prevent young people from being drawn into extremism or terrorism. Following this, training programmes were created so that teachers could fulfil this responsibility. In this study, primary school teachers’ experiences and opinions on the Prevent Duty are compared between two different schools in the same metropolitan council. The first school is situated in a community in which most people living there are Muslim; the second school is situated within a predominantly white, middle-class, non-Muslim community. Teachers were interviewed in semi-structured interviews about their experiences of the Prevent Duty, its training programmes and how relevant they considered it to be for the children they teach in their setting. Their responses to these questions are compared to identify any differences on attitudes towards the Prevent Duty between the two areas. Findings suggest that the way in which the Prevent Duty is viewed by teachers, including the importance they place on it, their experiences of the training programmes and how relevant they see it as being to the children in their setting differs between the two areas

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Education and Islamic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.