Achieving Equality: Why There Was Not as Much Inequality in Prehistoric Europe as We Imagine

Archaeologists have long investigated the rise of inequality in prehistoric Europe. This paper argues that images of steadily increasing inequality are usually based on cherry-picking particular outstanding cases and a selective interpretation of the results. Illustrated through a large-scale qualitative assessment of the Central Mediterranean, this paper makes two arguments. First, a broad review of evidence suggests that social inequality was not a major organising principle of most prehistoric societies. Instead, throughout prehistory, inequality formed part of a heterogeneous, heterarchical social order. Secondly, this was not simply due to historical chance or stagnation. As an outline “people’s history of prehistoric Europe” suggests, many of the archaeologically most visible developments in every period were actively aimed at undermining, encapsulating or directing the potential development of hierarchy. In this sense, Europe’s long prehistory of limited and ambiguous hierarchy do not represent a failure of social evolution but a widespread story of success at developing tactics for achieving maintaining equality.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.117728
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Achieving Equality: Why There Was Not as Much Inequality in Prehistoric Europe as We Imagine

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

Achieving Equality: Why There Was Not as Much Inequality in Prehistoric Europe as We Imagine

article en

Abstract

Archaeologists have long investigated the rise of inequality in prehistoric Europe. This paper argues that images of steadily increasing inequality are usually based on cherry-picking particular outstanding cases and a selective interpretation of the results. Illustrated through a large-scale qualitative assessment of the Central Mediterranean, this paper makes two arguments. First, a broad review of evidence suggests that social inequality was not a major organising principle of most prehistoric societies. Instead, throughout prehistory, inequality formed part of a heterogeneous, heterarchical social order. Secondly, this was not simply due to historical chance or stagnation. As an outline “people’s history of prehistoric Europe” suggests, many of the archaeologically most visible developments in every period were actively aimed at undermining, encapsulating or directing the potential development of hierarchy. In this sense, Europe’s long prehistory of limited and ambiguous hierarchy do not represent a failure of social evolution but a widespread story of success at developing tactics for achieving maintaining equality.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.