Constructing 'problems' and 'solutions': social innovation as social-symbolic work

We argue that social innovation, at its core, is a process of meaning construction that shapes understanding of what constitutes social ‘problems’ and what counts as appropriate ‘solutions’. To develop our argument, we combine the social-symbolic work perspective from organization theory with insights from Rothman’s community sociology to propose a simple framework of social-symbolic organizing for social innovation. The framework comprises three forms of work – social inclusion work (participatory organizing within marginalized groups), socio-political work (organizing marginalized groups to engage formal political structures), and social activism work (organizing marginalized groups through protest) – each of which is underpinned by a discrete set of social-symbolic practices. In doing so, we theorize a novel way of thinking about how social innovators construct meaning to make change and challenge the dominant conception of social innovation that prioritizes market-based activity.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.117835
Primary Topic
Innovation, Technology, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing 'problems' and 'solutions': social innovation as social-symbolic work

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Innovation, Technology, and Society
article

Constructing 'problems' and 'solutions': social innovation as social-symbolic work

article en

Abstract

We argue that social innovation, at its core, is a process of meaning construction that shapes understanding of what constitutes social ‘problems’ and what counts as appropriate ‘solutions’. To develop our argument, we combine the social-symbolic work perspective from organization theory with insights from Rothman’s community sociology to propose a simple framework of social-symbolic organizing for social innovation. The framework comprises three forms of work – social inclusion work (participatory organizing within marginalized groups), socio-political work (organizing marginalized groups to engage formal political structures), and social activism work (organizing marginalized groups through protest) – each of which is underpinned by a discrete set of social-symbolic practices. In doing so, we theorize a novel way of thinking about how social innovators construct meaning to make change and challenge the dominant conception of social innovation that prioritizes market-based activity.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Innovation, Technology, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.