Group Fairness in Reinforcement Learning and Large Language Models

This thesis addresses an important societal consideration in the application of Reinforcement Learning (RL): the equitable distribution of its benefits across different demographic groups. Specifically, we investigate how to incorporate group fairness into reinforcement learning algorithms to ensure that their societal impact is just and fair. The thesis is organized around two key contributions to group fairness in RL. The first contribution focuses on multi-task group fairness in reinforcement learn- ing. In many practical applications, such as recommender systems or fine-tuning large language models, a single policy is required to perform multiple tasks in real-world environments. In this thesis, we introduce a multi-task fairness constraint and propose a novel algorithm to solving this problem based on constrained optimization. Through experiments in Mujoco, we demonstrate that our method better ensures group fairness compared to the previous approach that lacks this multi-task fairness constraint. The second contribution studies group fairness in the context of fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) through Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF). Current approaches to address bias in LLMs largely concentrate on mitigating harmful language and often overlook group fairness considerations. In this work, we empha- sis on demographic parity, a key group fairness definition that aligns with the broader fair machine learning research. In this work, we identify reward models as a potential source of bias in the RLHF process and propose a novel evaluation method based on arXiv meta-data for group fairness in reward models. Our experiment on fine-tuning the Phi-1.5 model further demonstrates that biases in reward models can propagate into the fine-tuned LLMs during RLHF training.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Libra
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18130/mwpx-4j34
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Group Fairness in Reinforcement Learning and Large Language Models

Libra
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Group Fairness in Reinforcement Learning and Large Language Models

article en

Abstract

This thesis addresses an important societal consideration in the application of Reinforcement Learning (RL): the equitable distribution of its benefits across different demographic groups. Specifically, we investigate how to incorporate group fairness into reinforcement learning algorithms to ensure that their societal impact is just and fair. The thesis is organized around two key contributions to group fairness in RL. The first contribution focuses on multi-task group fairness in reinforcement learn- ing. In many practical applications, such as recommender systems or fine-tuning large language models, a single policy is required to perform multiple tasks in real-world environments. In this thesis, we introduce a multi-task fairness constraint and propose a novel algorithm to solving this problem based on constrained optimization. Through experiments in Mujoco, we demonstrate that our method better ensures group fairness compared to the previous approach that lacks this multi-task fairness constraint. The second contribution studies group fairness in the context of fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) through Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF). Current approaches to address bias in LLMs largely concentrate on mitigating harmful language and often overlook group fairness considerations. In this work, we empha- sis on demographic parity, a key group fairness definition that aligns with the broader fair machine learning research. In this work, we identify reward models as a potential source of bias in the RLHF process and propose a novel evaluation method based on arXiv meta-data for group fairness in reward models. Our experiment on fine-tuning the Phi-1.5 model further demonstrates that biases in reward models can propagate into the fine-tuned LLMs during RLHF training.

Libra
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.