Investigating Objective and Subjective Social Exclusion in a Group Conversation Led by a Robot

This study investigates ostracism-based social exclusion in multi-person interactions with robots. To examine this phenomenon, we will conduct a laboratory study in which participants engage in a simulated job interview with the robot Ameca acting as the interviewer. The study compares objective exclusion (measured by the proportion of the robot's attention directed toward each participant) and subjective exclusion (participants' self-reported feelings of being ignored or excluded). We aim to identify the point at which objective exclusion leads to subjective feelings of exclusion and how this impact need fulfillment. After the interview, participants are allowed to stand somewhere else and are asked why they chose the same or a different standing position. Exploratory analyses will examine whether factors such as gender, height, or physical position (angle) relative to the robot influence the actual or assumed likelihood of being excluded.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Science Framework
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/s7k5u
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating Objective and Subjective Social Exclusion in a Group Conversation Led by a Robot

1 citations
Open Science Framework
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
2.44
article

Investigating Objective and Subjective Social Exclusion in a Group Conversation Led by a Robot

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates ostracism-based social exclusion in multi-person interactions with robots. To examine this phenomenon, we will conduct a laboratory study in which participants engage in a simulated job interview with the robot Ameca acting as the interviewer. The study compares objective exclusion (measured by the proportion of the robot's attention directed toward each participant) and subjective exclusion (participants' self-reported feelings of being ignored or excluded). We aim to identify the point at which objective exclusion leads to subjective feelings of exclusion and how this impact need fulfillment. After the interview, participants are allowed to stand somewhere else and are asked why they chose the same or a different standing position. Exploratory analyses will examine whether factors such as gender, height, or physical position (angle) relative to the robot influence the actual or assumed likelihood of being excluded.

Open Science Framework
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.