Review: Gabriele Griffin, ed. Who's Who in Gay and Lesbian Writing. London: Routledge, 2002.

In lieu of an abstract, here is the first paragraph of the review: It is an open secret that the biographical guide or dictionary is the most intertextual genre of all academic writing - and the least acknowledged to be so. Looking up individual entries in several dictionaries (possibly in the course of researching for a 'new' biographical abstract oneself?), one encounters very often one and the same portrait of a writer. Editing and compiling a biographical guide neither seems to be a very original task nor do existing articles on individual authors, unlike book-length biographies or studies, seem to enjoy something like a copyright - they are common academic knowledge. Of course there is only so much one can present within a limited space and most of this space is taken up by the presentation of unchanging factual knowledge such as birth dates, education, publications, maybe suggestions for secondary reading. However, a foray into several lexica and dictionaries should ideally be rewarded by a more differentiated portrait of the person one is in quest of, not just slightly differing versions of the same.

Publication Details

Journal
Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln
Published
2024-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18716/ojs/gefo/2003.2818
Primary Topic
Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review: Gabriele Griffin, ed. Who's Who in Gay and Lesbian Writing. London: Routledge, 2002.

Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln
Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
article

Review: Gabriele Griffin, ed. Who's Who in Gay and Lesbian Writing. London: Routledge, 2002.

article en

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is the first paragraph of the review: It is an open secret that the biographical guide or dictionary is the most intertextual genre of all academic writing - and the least acknowledged to be so. Looking up individual entries in several dictionaries (possibly in the course of researching for a 'new' biographical abstract oneself?), one encounters very often one and the same portrait of a writer. Editing and compiling a biographical guide neither seems to be a very original task nor do existing articles on individual authors, unlike book-length biographies or studies, seem to enjoy something like a copyright - they are common academic knowledge. Of course there is only so much one can present within a limited space and most of this space is taken up by the presentation of unchanging factual knowledge such as birth dates, education, publications, maybe suggestions for secondary reading. However, a foray into several lexica and dictionaries should ideally be rewarded by a more differentiated portrait of the person one is in quest of, not just slightly differing versions of the same.

Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.