Researcher Bias: McGilChrist and Mannheim -Six Specific Problem Areas due to the materialist "rigid adherence" to the quantification (McGilChrist) and laboratory experiments (Kay Deaux)

Researcher Bias: From Mannheim to McGilChrist – Six Specific Problem Areas due to the materialist "rigid adherence" to quantification (McGilChrist) and laboratory experiments (Kay Deaux) Preface – When 95 % of views were at the same time – simultaneously - and all had 2 pages read – you know it is spam-bots: Universidad de Seville the United States Researcher Bias.. 2 pages read Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Researcher Bias 2 pages read Université de Strasbourg Researcher Bias: From Mannheim to... 2 pages read Dartmouth College Researcher Bias: From Mannheim to... 2 pages read "It is not true if the major premise is not true" – Justice Rehnquist Materialist Fallacy-Maladaptive Stereotype: spirituality is unreal William R. Miller and Carl E. Thoresen, state" A philosophical basis for this perspective is materialism, the belief that there is nothing to study because spirituality is intangible and beyond the senses." That fallacy generates widespread "wrong thinking" to use Justice Rehnquist's terminology, and creates the illusion that "spirituality is unreal" which is a widespread maladaptive stereotype. My 2018 critique of the Materialist Fallacy endorsed by Dr Harold Koenig, Dr Paul Wong, Dr. Stephen Farra, and Stefan Schindler has been peer reviewed with well over 10,000 views since 2018 and zero criticisms. The critique identifies the statement that spirituality is intangible as a "loaded term" making any real dialogue impossible and puts it into the category of a Definist Fallacy. "Death is a figment of your imagination!" An illustration of the Materialist Fallacy! Now, if you consider the concept of "death" – which, of course, is "intangible and beyond the senses" and plug that into the materialist line of reasoning, then, "Death becomes a "figment of your imagination" – which is absurd of course. Yet, "All spirituality is unreal" is equally absurd – on several levels. Besides the materialist argument being a fiction – a complete fallacy, there are several types of spirituality which are actually very tangible and measurable. Abstract: The essay argues that a pervasive researcher bias rooted in materialist ideology has led to several critical problems in the social sciences. A number of "errors and omissions" have emerged within the realm of social sciences, These biases have led to several critical issues: As Claudia Nielsen pointed out, the psychiatrist McGilChrist stated unequivocally that "The scope of inquiry and understanding of the Materialist Doctrine with its rigid adherence to the actually arbitrary principle of quantification and over-emphasis on physiological characteristics is severely restricted and limited in the analyses that can be performed." Seven Problem Areas 1. marginalization of symbolism (Rollo May. Elzbieta Halas) in academic research due to a focus on quantification and empirical evidence. – which confirms McGilChrist's argument that materialist doctrine "limits" analyses 2. Materialist fallacy-maladaptive stereotype that "All spirituality is intangible and unreal" The materialist quantification aspect of materialist doctrine is what produced the fixation with spirituality "intangible" – which is false. Compassion, music, and grieving are three very tangible aspects if spirituality – just to name three. Now in 2018 3. Social Psychology's Emphasis on Experimenter-Created Social Groups - Kay Deaux, highlights the fact that social psychology has historically had an "emphasis on experimenter-created social groups" which "precluded most affective displays."- which confirms McGilChrist's argument that materialist methodology "limits analyses 4. Allport's 1927 false premise "There is no psychology of groups" The materialist emphasis on laboratory experiments and quantification has sidelined and marginalized social consciousness. In fact, from my research it appears a proper theory of social consciousness does not exist. Ontology – nature of being – does not explain powerful and dynamic movements such as the contemporary tea party movement and anti-scie3nce movement hijacked by Trump. 5. Extreme Individualism and the academic abstraction of Free Will leads to a lapse of morals. Studies by Kathleen Vohs and Jonathan Schooler have shown that when individuals are led to disbelieve in free will, they exhibit lower levels of moral behavior and increased conformity to base instincts. It would seem readily apparent that social relationships have been minimalized and marginalized due to the materialist bias 6. Geertz's outmoded definition of religion overlooks crucial aspects like community, identity, and spiritual beliefs - and the need for a more holistic approach to understanding human behavior that acknowledges the importance of symbolism, spirituality, and social context. Religions are groups and communities. b. Identity – and way of life - are very salient and pivotal factors c. The teachings of religion are an important aspect of religions. d. "Spirit" is pivotal in religious beliefs e. Spiritual/religious beliefs are a social consciousness as well as a system of symbols f. Evolutionary Adaptive Selective attention trait as a pivotal psychological function which focuses attention and over-rides competing needs – desires to assure total commitment to hunter-gatherer goals. Setting the Stage: The mind is able to comprehend all other things, but not of understanding itself." The mind which is in each of us is able to comprehend all other things, but has not the capability of understanding itself. For as the eye sees all other things, but cannot see itself, so also the mind perceives the nature of other things but cannot understand itself." ~Philo the Jew; (Allegorical Interpretations I) It stands to reason that, in principle, human consciousness can only understand itself through a "frame of reference' that is inherent human consciousness. So, all philosophies and social sciences are in one form or another "mindsets" or "modes of thought" – including the materialist ideology. Christine Maimone makes a similar observation: "Social science becomes an increasingly complex [in] that social scientists themselves are firmly embedded in a social context and subject to ideological and utopian thought." Both Kenneth Gergen and Maimone argue that "social knowledge" is a distinct category from "Physical Knowledge" Researcher Bias: From Mannheim to McGilChrist – Six Specific Problem Areas due to the materialist "rigid adherence" to quantification (McGilChrist) and laboratory experiments (Kay Deaux) The essay presents evidence that a pervasive researcher bias rooted in materialist ideology has led to several critical issues in the social sciences. A number of "errors and omissions" have emerged within the realm of social sciences, These biases have led to several critical issues: As Claudia Nielsen pointed out, the psychiatrist McGilChrist stated unequivocally that "The scope of inquiry and understanding of the Materialist Doctrine with its rigid adherence to the actually arbitrary principle of quantification and over-emphasis on physiological characteristics is severely restricted and limited in the analyses that can be performed." Seven Problem Areas 1. marginalization of symbolism (Rollo May. Elzbieta Halas) in academic research due to a focus on quantification and empirical evidence. – which confirms McGilChrist's argument that materialist doctrine "limits" analyses 2. Materialist fallacy-maladaptive stereotype that "All spirituality is intangible and unreal" The materialist quantification aspect of materialist doctrine is what produced the fixation with spirituality "intangible" – which is false. Compassion, music, and grieving are three very tangible aspects if spirituality – just to name three 3. Social Psychology's Emphasis on Experimenter-Created Social Groups - Kay Deaux, highlights the fact that social psychology has historically had an "emphasis on experimenter-created social groups" which "precluded most affective displays."- which confirms McGilChrist's argument that materialist methodology "limits analyses 4. Allport's 1927 false premise "There is no psychology of groups" The materialist emphasis on laboratory experiments and quantification has sidelined and marginalized social consciousness. In fact, from my research it appears a proper theory of social consciousness does not exist. Ontology – nature of being – does not explain powerful and dynamic movements such as the contemporary tea party movement and anti-scie3nce movement hijacked by Trump. 5. Extreme Individualism and the academic abstraction of Free Will leads to a lapse of morals. Studies by Kathleen Vohs and Jonathan Schooler have shown that when individuals are led to disbelieve in free will, they exhibit lower levels of moral behavior and increased conformity to base instincts. It would seem readily apparent that social relationships have been minimalized and marginalized due to the materialist bias 6. Geertz's outmoded definition of religion overlooks crucial aspects like community, identity, and spiritual beliefs - and the need for a more holistic approach to understanding human behavior that acknowledges the importance of symbolism, spirituality, and social context. Religions are groups and communities. b. Identity – and way of life - are very salient and pivotal factors c. The teachings of religion are an important aspect of religions. d. "Spirit" is pivotal in religious beliefs e. Spiritual/religious beliefs are a social consciousness as well as a system of symbols f. Evolutionary Adaptive Selective attention trait as a pivotal psychological function which focuses attention and over-rides competing needs – desires to assure total commitment to hunter-gatherer goals. Reflections and Commentary Iain McGilchrist states that "An increasingly mechanistic, fragmented, decontextualised world, marked by unwarranted optimism mixed with paranoia and a feeling of emp