The Concept of Evaluation of Quality of Justice or Procedural Clipbait (As a Review of the Article by I.A. Gizatullin, Conceptual Problems of Evaluation of Quality of Justice)

The author of the article under review has gone in a circle from the statement of the problem – a statement about the need to create a concept for assessing the quality of justice, to a scientifically significant conclusion about the possibility of creating a concept for assessing the quality of justice. The most controversial and unsubstantiated statements are listed and a methodological error is indicated. Arguments are given about the impossibility of constructing a concept for assessing the quality of justice and developing objective criteria that actually reflect judicial work. It is summarized that assessing the quality of justice contradicts the principle of judicial independence and the reasons for this are explained.

Publication Details

Journal
Уголовное судопроизводство.
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4411-2024-4-12-16
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Concept of Evaluation of Quality of Justice or Procedural Clipbait (As a Review of the Article by I.A. Gizatullin, Conceptual Problems of Evaluation of Quality of Justice)

Уголовное судопроизводство.
Education, Law, and Society
article

The Concept of Evaluation of Quality of Justice or Procedural Clipbait (As a Review of the Article by I.A. Gizatullin, Conceptual Problems of Evaluation of Quality of Justice)

article en

Abstract

The author of the article under review has gone in a circle from the statement of the problem – a statement about the need to create a concept for assessing the quality of justice, to a scientifically significant conclusion about the possibility of creating a concept for assessing the quality of justice. The most controversial and unsubstantiated statements are listed and a methodological error is indicated. Arguments are given about the impossibility of constructing a concept for assessing the quality of justice and developing objective criteria that actually reflect judicial work. It is summarized that assessing the quality of justice contradicts the principle of judicial independence and the reasons for this are explained.

Уголовное судопроизводство.
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Concept of Evaluation of Quality of Justice or Procedural Clipbait (As a Review of the Article by I.A. Gizatullin, Conceptual Problems of Evaluation of Quality of Justice) · Уголовное судопроизводство. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS