Evaluation of the Bonding Effectiveness of Ion-Releasing and Conventional Resin Composites in Dental Restorations: A Systematic Review

In contemporary adhesive dentistry, achieving optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes while preserving as much dental tissue as possible has become a priority. There is consistent scientific evidence in the literature regarding the excellent clinical performance of composite resin restorations, whose longevity is directly related to the formation of the hybrid layer (HL) (Van Meerbeek et al., 2020; Rodolpho et al., 2022). Advancements in restorative materials have driven the development of hybrid compositions that combine composite resins with glass ionomer cements (GICs). This strategy aims to integrate the advantages of composite resins, such as mechanical strength, aesthetics, and high adhesion, with the beneficial properties of GICs, including self-adhesiveness, moisture tolerance, and ion release (Klee et al., 2020). However, a specific gap remains in the literature regarding the bond strength of these hybrid materials, a critical factor for the clinical longevity of restorations particularly when compared to conventional composite resins. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to evaluate and compare, through the analysis of both in vitro and clinical studies, the bond strength of ion-releasing resin versus conventional resin composite.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Science Framework
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/g6wcb
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Bonding Effectiveness of Ion-Releasing and Conventional Resin Composites in Dental Restorations: A Systematic Review

1 citations
Open Science Framework
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
article

Evaluation of the Bonding Effectiveness of Ion-Releasing and Conventional Resin Composites in Dental Restorations: A Systematic Review

article en
1 citations

Abstract

In contemporary adhesive dentistry, achieving optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes while preserving as much dental tissue as possible has become a priority. There is consistent scientific evidence in the literature regarding the excellent clinical performance of composite resin restorations, whose longevity is directly related to the formation of the hybrid layer (HL) (Van Meerbeek et al., 2020; Rodolpho et al., 2022). Advancements in restorative materials have driven the development of hybrid compositions that combine composite resins with glass ionomer cements (GICs). This strategy aims to integrate the advantages of composite resins, such as mechanical strength, aesthetics, and high adhesion, with the beneficial properties of GICs, including self-adhesiveness, moisture tolerance, and ion release (Klee et al., 2020). However, a specific gap remains in the literature regarding the bond strength of these hybrid materials, a critical factor for the clinical longevity of restorations particularly when compared to conventional composite resins. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to evaluate and compare, through the analysis of both in vitro and clinical studies, the bond strength of ion-releasing resin versus conventional resin composite.

Open Science Framework
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the Bonding Effectiveness of Ion-Releasing and Conventional Resin Composites in Dental Restorations: A Systematic Review · Open Science Framework (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS