Unveiling the Effects of Crop Rotation on Cropland Soil pH Mapping: A Remote Sensing-Based Soil Sample Grouping Strategy

Crop rotation affects soil pH by disturbing H + production and consumption within soil–crop systems, primarily through fertilization, irrigation, cropping, and harvest. Studies have shown that crop rotation improves soil organic matter prediction. However, simply incorporating crop rotation may not significantly improve soil pH prediction, because the spatial variability in soil pH is lower and the way crop rotation influences pH is different. To quantify the extent to which crop rotation improves soil pH mapping, we introduced the strategy of grouping soil samples by crop rotation and modeling separately. We chose a typical multiple-cropping region suffering soil acidification in Southern China, where the complex crop rotation was mapped by Sentinel-1/2 time series and a legend featuring three main systems (i.e., paddy, vegetable, and orchard) and nine subsystems. This crop rotation map was then combined with other variables to derive multiple combinations and predict soil pH. Based on the best combination, we further assessed the grouping strategy. The results showed that simply incorporating crop rotation in one joint model was useful but could not obtain the expected accuracy, with a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.66 and an R 2 of 0.36. The individual statistical accuracies were quite low for the vegetable and orchard rotations, with an RMSE of 0.77/0.70 and an R 2 of 0.30/−0.04. Grouping soil samples by crop rotation significantly enhanced soil pH predictability with a decrease in the RMSE of 15% and an increase in the R 2 of 53%. The results proved that grouping by crop rotation can fit and optimize the sub-models after learning the characteristics of the rotation subsamples, offering a way for improving digital mapping of soil pH over heterogeneous agricultural landscapes.

Publication Details

Journal
edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18452/33683
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the Effects of Crop Rotation on Cropland Soil pH Mapping: A Remote Sensing-Based Soil Sample Grouping Strategy

edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

Unveiling the Effects of Crop Rotation on Cropland Soil pH Mapping: A Remote Sensing-Based Soil Sample Grouping Strategy

article en

Abstract

Crop rotation affects soil pH by disturbing H + production and consumption within soil–crop systems, primarily through fertilization, irrigation, cropping, and harvest. Studies have shown that crop rotation improves soil organic matter prediction. However, simply incorporating crop rotation may not significantly improve soil pH prediction, because the spatial variability in soil pH is lower and the way crop rotation influences pH is different. To quantify the extent to which crop rotation improves soil pH mapping, we introduced the strategy of grouping soil samples by crop rotation and modeling separately. We chose a typical multiple-cropping region suffering soil acidification in Southern China, where the complex crop rotation was mapped by Sentinel-1/2 time series and a legend featuring three main systems (i.e., paddy, vegetable, and orchard) and nine subsystems. This crop rotation map was then combined with other variables to derive multiple combinations and predict soil pH. Based on the best combination, we further assessed the grouping strategy. The results showed that simply incorporating crop rotation in one joint model was useful but could not obtain the expected accuracy, with a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.66 and an R 2 of 0.36. The individual statistical accuracies were quite low for the vegetable and orchard rotations, with an RMSE of 0.77/0.70 and an R 2 of 0.30/−0.04. Grouping soil samples by crop rotation significantly enhanced soil pH predictability with a decrease in the RMSE of 15% and an increase in the R 2 of 53%. The results proved that grouping by crop rotation can fit and optimize the sub-models after learning the characteristics of the rotation subsamples, offering a way for improving digital mapping of soil pH over heterogeneous agricultural landscapes.

edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.