Atomic Dissociation in South Korea: The Politics of Technology, Memory, and Modernity in the 1970s

While North Korea’s nuclear weapons program draws global attention, South Korea has quietly built one of the most advanced nuclear energy industries in the world. Since the 1970s, nuclear technology has supported South Korea’s rapid economic growth and energy security, culminating in its emergence as a nuclear reactor exporter by 2009. Yet this development has received limited scholarly scrutiny. This dissertation argues that South Korea’s embrace of nuclear energy was made possible by a cultural mechanism called “atomic dissociation”: the tendency to highlight the utopian promise of nuclear technology—limitless energy, national strength, scientific progress—while suppressing its destructive legacy. This allowed nuclear power to be framed as essential to South Korea’s Cold War-era goals of development, decolonization, and security, even as the memory of Hiroshima and the risks of nuclear catastrophe were downplayed. Through a range of Korean- and English-language sources, including technical reports, media, treaties, and protest materials, this study reveals how multiple actors—technocrats, dissidents, scientists, and civil society groups—engaged nuclear technology on different terms. Rather than a neutral tool, nuclear power emerges as a contested site where visions of modernity, justice, and autonomy were negotiated. This dissertation repositions South Korea within global nuclear history and calls into question widely held assumptions about the relationship between technological progress and human advancement.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Libra
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18130/k3ff-e783
Primary Topic
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atomic Dissociation in South Korea: The Politics of Technology, Memory, and Modernity in the 1970s

Libra
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
article

Atomic Dissociation in South Korea: The Politics of Technology, Memory, and Modernity in the 1970s

article en

Abstract

While North Korea’s nuclear weapons program draws global attention, South Korea has quietly built one of the most advanced nuclear energy industries in the world. Since the 1970s, nuclear technology has supported South Korea’s rapid economic growth and energy security, culminating in its emergence as a nuclear reactor exporter by 2009. Yet this development has received limited scholarly scrutiny. This dissertation argues that South Korea’s embrace of nuclear energy was made possible by a cultural mechanism called “atomic dissociation”: the tendency to highlight the utopian promise of nuclear technology—limitless energy, national strength, scientific progress—while suppressing its destructive legacy. This allowed nuclear power to be framed as essential to South Korea’s Cold War-era goals of development, decolonization, and security, even as the memory of Hiroshima and the risks of nuclear catastrophe were downplayed. Through a range of Korean- and English-language sources, including technical reports, media, treaties, and protest materials, this study reveals how multiple actors—technocrats, dissidents, scientists, and civil society groups—engaged nuclear technology on different terms. Rather than a neutral tool, nuclear power emerges as a contested site where visions of modernity, justice, and autonomy were negotiated. This dissertation repositions South Korea within global nuclear history and calls into question widely held assumptions about the relationship between technological progress and human advancement.

Libra
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.