Adjusting Fairness and Diversity in Search Results: User-Driven Re-Ranking for Water Research Literature

Search systems are a crucial means for users to access information. However, considering only the top search results naturally comes with biases that increase even further with personalization, biased databases, or intransparent retrieval systems. We believe that it is essential that users can a) easily understand the characteristics of their search results and b) control them. Our work investigates how the demand for a more fair attribute representation or more diverse perspectives on a topic can be reflected in search results to various degrees. We propose re-ranking methods integrating those user-defined variety settings and an extension of a diversity evaluation metric regarding exposure. Applied to literature search in the multidisciplinary domain of water the methods effectively adjust rankings to match different variety preferences. With that, we demonstrate the potential to enhance user control over search variety, contributing to transparency about entrenched biases and promoting a more user-centered search experience.

Publication Details

Journal
Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18420/btw2025-06
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adjusting Fairness and Diversity in Search Results: User-Driven Re-Ranking for Water Research Literature

Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
article

Adjusting Fairness and Diversity in Search Results: User-Driven Re-Ranking for Water Research Literature

article en

Abstract

Search systems are a crucial means for users to access information. However, considering only the top search results naturally comes with biases that increase even further with personalization, biased databases, or intransparent retrieval systems. We believe that it is essential that users can a) easily understand the characteristics of their search results and b) control them. Our work investigates how the demand for a more fair attribute representation or more diverse perspectives on a topic can be reflected in search results to various degrees. We propose re-ranking methods integrating those user-defined variety settings and an extension of a diversity evaluation metric regarding exposure. Applied to literature search in the multidisciplinary domain of water the methods effectively adjust rankings to match different variety preferences. With that, we demonstrate the potential to enhance user control over search variety, contributing to transparency about entrenched biases and promoting a more user-centered search experience.

Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adjusting Fairness and Diversity in Search Results: User-Driven Re-Ranking for Water Research Literature · Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS