The Influence of Ethics Commitments and Audits on Public Trust in AI

Corporations increasingly pursue AI ethics commitments, ranging from AI principles to third-party audits. Prior scholarship on private governance suggests these commitments are intended to build consumer trust, minimize information asymmetries, and mitigate social, ethical, and organizational risks. This project closes the empirical gap on these strategies' effectiveness by evaluating whether corporate adoption of AI ethics commitments causally increases consumer trust and mitigates demand for state intervention. We will administer a survey with three experimental components to 3,000 participants in the U.S. and Germany. Study one assesses whether \textit{signaling} an organization's leadership via the adoption of AI ethics principles, \textit{investment} in responsible AI staff, or external \textit{accountability} efforts such as third-party audits enhances consumer trust. Study two and three involve an informational video and a choice-based conjoint design, respectively, to explore whether factors like the nature of the audit, the auditing organization, and characteristics of the audited company matter for consumers and if they depend on consumers’ knowledge about AI audits.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/7cp6z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Ethics Commitments and Audits on Public Trust in AI

1 citations
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

The Influence of Ethics Commitments and Audits on Public Trust in AI

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Corporations increasingly pursue AI ethics commitments, ranging from AI principles to third-party audits. Prior scholarship on private governance suggests these commitments are intended to build consumer trust, minimize information asymmetries, and mitigate social, ethical, and organizational risks. This project closes the empirical gap on these strategies' effectiveness by evaluating whether corporate adoption of AI ethics commitments causally increases consumer trust and mitigates demand for state intervention. We will administer a survey with three experimental components to 3,000 participants in the U.S. and Germany. Study one assesses whether \textit{signaling} an organization's leadership via the adoption of AI ethics principles, \textit{investment} in responsible AI staff, or external \textit{accountability} efforts such as third-party audits enhances consumer trust. Study two and three involve an informational video and a choice-based conjoint design, respectively, to explore whether factors like the nature of the audit, the auditing organization, and characteristics of the audited company matter for consumers and if they depend on consumers’ knowledge about AI audits.

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.