Power hierarchies during “field” visits: recommendations for researchers

This project examines how power hierarchies affect research visits conducted by staff and students at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and outlines practical recommendations to help researchers navigate these dynamics. While efforts to promote equitable research partnerships and decolonise research have resulted in guidance about shifting decision-making from "Northern" (e.g., UK) to "Southern" (Global South) institutions more broadly, there is less practical guidance on how to identify and navigate complex power dynamics (especially those related to gender, race, age, and expertise) during “field” visits, when data collection, training or meetings occur. These power dynamics exist not only between Northern/Southern actors but also within research teams themselves and can manifest in many ways, including as sexism, racism, White Saviourism, microaggressions, cultural insensitivity, and assumptions about expertise. However, there are many promising practices being implemented to promote equitable research and change these dynamics. The project aims to develop practical recommendations for researchers to address these micro- and macro-level power hierarchies during overseas visits, through: a) a rapid review of literature; b) interviews with LSHTM staff, Research Degree students, and research partners, and c) feedback workshops with research participants, as well as other interested staff, students and research partners, filling gaps in existing global health research guidance and LSHTM's own resources.

Publication Details

Journal
LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17037/pubs.04675452
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power hierarchies during “field” visits: recommendations for researchers

LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Power hierarchies during “field” visits: recommendations for researchers

article en

Abstract

This project examines how power hierarchies affect research visits conducted by staff and students at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and outlines practical recommendations to help researchers navigate these dynamics. While efforts to promote equitable research partnerships and decolonise research have resulted in guidance about shifting decision-making from "Northern" (e.g., UK) to "Southern" (Global South) institutions more broadly, there is less practical guidance on how to identify and navigate complex power dynamics (especially those related to gender, race, age, and expertise) during “field” visits, when data collection, training or meetings occur. These power dynamics exist not only between Northern/Southern actors but also within research teams themselves and can manifest in many ways, including as sexism, racism, White Saviourism, microaggressions, cultural insensitivity, and assumptions about expertise. However, there are many promising practices being implemented to promote equitable research and change these dynamics. The project aims to develop practical recommendations for researchers to address these micro- and macro-level power hierarchies during overseas visits, through: a) a rapid review of literature; b) interviews with LSHTM staff, Research Degree students, and research partners, and c) feedback workshops with research participants, as well as other interested staff, students and research partners, filling gaps in existing global health research guidance and LSHTM's own resources.

LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.