Systematic Literature Review of Computer Aided Inspection Planning For On-Machine Inspection

The increasing demand for customized products in the machining industry necessitates innovative solutions for effective quality assurance. This systematic literature review examines the current state of Computer-Aided Inspection Planning (CAIP) for on-machine inspection, highlighting its pivotal role in establishing a closed-loop manufacturing system. Despite advancements in integrating measurement feedback into production processes, significant challenges remain due to the complexity of customer-specific features and the limitations of existing methodologies. The review reveals that while many studies focus on individual aspects of CAIP, such as feature extraction from CAD models or inspection code generation, none provide a comprehensive framework that fully automates the entire CAIP process, particularly for tactile on-machine inspection. A distinct research gap is identified: the lack of cohesive strategies that integrate the various components of CAIP into a seamless workflow. This paper underscores the urgent need for further research to develop methodologies that facilitate the full automation of CAIP, ensuring real-time adaptability and efficiency in the machining process. Addressing this gap is crucial for advancing automated quality assurance in an era of mass customization, thereby enhancing productivity and maintaining high-quality standards across diverse manufacturing scenarios.

Publication Details

Journal
Leibniz Universität Hannover
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15488/19235
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Literature Review of Computer Aided Inspection Planning For On-Machine Inspection

Leibniz Universität Hannover
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

Systematic Literature Review of Computer Aided Inspection Planning For On-Machine Inspection

article en

Abstract

The increasing demand for customized products in the machining industry necessitates innovative solutions for effective quality assurance. This systematic literature review examines the current state of Computer-Aided Inspection Planning (CAIP) for on-machine inspection, highlighting its pivotal role in establishing a closed-loop manufacturing system. Despite advancements in integrating measurement feedback into production processes, significant challenges remain due to the complexity of customer-specific features and the limitations of existing methodologies. The review reveals that while many studies focus on individual aspects of CAIP, such as feature extraction from CAD models or inspection code generation, none provide a comprehensive framework that fully automates the entire CAIP process, particularly for tactile on-machine inspection. A distinct research gap is identified: the lack of cohesive strategies that integrate the various components of CAIP into a seamless workflow. This paper underscores the urgent need for further research to develop methodologies that facilitate the full automation of CAIP, ensuring real-time adaptability and efficiency in the machining process. Addressing this gap is crucial for advancing automated quality assurance in an era of mass customization, thereby enhancing productivity and maintaining high-quality standards across diverse manufacturing scenarios.

Leibniz Universität Hannover
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.