Vernacular Imaginaries of the Southern Seas

Few people native to the contemporary nation-states that make up the region known in English today as “Southeast Asia” would call themselves “Southeast Asians.” The process by which “Southeast Asia” became a distinct region in the international system, separate from the broader East Asian region of which it is a part, as well as a separate disciplinary specialization in academia, has long been understood to be one rooted in external strategic interests dating roughly from the 1940s. Through the upheavals of mid-twentieth-century wars, the region was ascribed a common political and economic character exogenously and militarily. The establishment of the Allied South East Asia Command in 1943 defined it negatively, as a space from which Japan should be expelled: a regionalizing salvo against Japan’s positive identification of a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere over which Japan should preside. After the defeat of Japan and the creation of an Anglo-American hegemonic compact over the wider East Asian region, it came to be understood variously as a space of concentrated political revolt against Western rule, of underdevelopment, of political instability, and of susceptibility to communism.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.117189
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vernacular Imaginaries of the Southern Seas

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Japanese History and Culture
article

Vernacular Imaginaries of the Southern Seas

article en

Abstract

Few people native to the contemporary nation-states that make up the region known in English today as “Southeast Asia” would call themselves “Southeast Asians.” The process by which “Southeast Asia” became a distinct region in the international system, separate from the broader East Asian region of which it is a part, as well as a separate disciplinary specialization in academia, has long been understood to be one rooted in external strategic interests dating roughly from the 1940s. Through the upheavals of mid-twentieth-century wars, the region was ascribed a common political and economic character exogenously and militarily. The establishment of the Allied South East Asia Command in 1943 defined it negatively, as a space from which Japan should be expelled: a regionalizing salvo against Japan’s positive identification of a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere over which Japan should preside. After the defeat of Japan and the creation of an Anglo-American hegemonic compact over the wider East Asian region, it came to be understood variously as a space of concentrated political revolt against Western rule, of underdevelopment, of political instability, and of susceptibility to communism.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.